Population 9,879 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
More maps of Pryor: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Pryor
Household size in Pryor
| Period | Pryor | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.38 | 2.56 | 2.55 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.58 | 2.60 | 2.60 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.54 | 2.60 | 2.63 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.62 | 2.59 | 2.58 | 2.65 |
| Change | +0.24 | +0.03 | +0.03 | −0.03 |
Households in Pryor average 2.62 people, about the same as the country as a whole (2.65). Household size has climbed from 2.38 in 2006–10, even as the national average fell. Households are largest in the south and smallest in the center.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Pryor
| Period | Pryor | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 39.2 | 37.2 | 37.4 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 38.4 | 37.5 | 37.5 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 38.4 | 37.8 | 37.9 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 38.7 | 38.0 | 38.0 | 40.1 |
| Change | −0.5 | +0.8 | +0.6 | +2.3 |
At 38.7, the median age in Pryor is close to the national median of 40.1, so its age mix looks much like the country's. The median age has edged down from 39.2 in 2006–10, even as the national median rose. Residents skew youngest in the south and oldest in the northeast.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Pryor
| Period | Pryor | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 8.1% | 11.7% | 11.9% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 11.4% | 12.5% | 12.1% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 14.3% | 12.2% | 12.1% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 11.8% | 11.6% | 12.0% | 11.6% |
| Change | +3.7 pts | −0.1 pts | +0.1 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single parents head nearly one in eight households in Pryor (11.8%), close to the national share of 11.6%. Since 2006–10, the single-parent share has risen 3.7 points, even as the national share fell.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Pryor
Renters in Pryor
| Period | Pryor | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 31.1% | 32.5% | 31.8% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 31.6% | 33.8% | 33.5% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 33.6% | 35.2% | 34.4% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 30.9% | 34.5% | 34.2% | 34.8% |
| Change | −0.2 pts | +2.1 pts | +2.4 pts | +1.5 pts |
Just over three in ten households in Pryor rent their homes (30.9%), a little below the national share of 34.8%; the rest own. Nearly half of owners (47.6%) have paid off their mortgages, above the national share of 39.8%. Renting is most common in the north and least common in the southwest.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Pryor
| Period | Pryor | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 11.5% | 10.1% | 12.8% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 13.5% | 10.3% | 12.7% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 12.8% | 10.6% | 13.5% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 11.4% | 8.5% | 11.3% | 9.6% |
| Change | −0.2 pts | −1.7 pts | −1.5 pts | −1.8 pts |
Vacancy runs a little high in Pryor: 11.4% of homes are empty, against 9.6% nationally. The count includes vacation homes and homes between owners or tenants, not just abandoned ones.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Pryor
| Period | Pryor | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1978 | 1978 | 1976 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1977 | 1979 | 1977 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1979 | 1980 | 1979 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1981 | 1983 | 1982 | 1980 |
| Change | +4 | +6 | +7 | +6 |
Homes in Pryor are about the same age as the nation's housing: the median home was built in 1981, versus 1980 nationally. The median year built has moved up from 1978 in 2006–10, a sign of steady new building.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Pryor
| Period | Pryor | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $568 | $794 | $716 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $692 | $872 | $805 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $801 | $979 | $897 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $924 | $1,219 | $1,127 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$356 | +$425 | +$411 | +$606 |
Rent in Pryor runs $924 a month at the median, utilities included, well below the U.S. median of $1,571. Rents are up $356 a month from 2006–10, a 63% jump, roughly in step with the nation. The typical renter here spends 24.4% of household income on rent, comfortably under the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, and a smaller share than renters pay nationally. The priciest rents are in the southwest; the most affordable are in the east.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Pryor
Bachelor's degrees in Pryor
| Period | Pryor | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 12.2% | 25.5% | 24.2% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 19.6% | 26.2% | 24.9% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 16.2% | 27.7% | 26.1% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 20.6% | 30.3% | 28.9% | 35.6% |
| Change | +8.4 pts | +4.8 pts | +4.7 pts | +7.2 pts |
College degrees are relatively uncommon in Pryor: 20.6% of adults 25 and older hold a bachelor's or higher, well below the national share of 35.6%. The share with a degree is up 8.4 points from 2006–10, as it has nationally.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Pryor
| Period | Pryor | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 84.8% | 87.7% | 86.0% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 86.2% | 88.4% | 87.0% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 88.5% | 89.3% | 88.1% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 90.4% | 90.1% | 89.3% | 89.3% |
| Change | +5.6 pts | +2.4 pts | +3.3 pts | +4.3 pts |
High school completion in Pryor is close to the national rate: 90.4% of adults have a diploma or equivalent, against 89.3%. The share with a diploma is up 5.6 points from 2006–10, in line with the national trend.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Pryor
| Period | Pryor | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 8.3% | 6.2% | 6.1% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 7.1% | 7.1% | 6.8% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 6.5% | 5.5% | 5.2% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 6.1% | 5.2% | 5.0% | 5.4% |
| Change | −2.2 pts | −0.9 pts | −1.1 pts | −2.7 pts |
Jobs have been a little harder to find in Pryor than nationally: unemployment was 6.1%, against 5.4%. Unemployment has fallen 2.2 points since 2006–10, mirroring the country. Because the Census pools five years of responses (2020–24), these rates smooth over short swings and lag the current job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Pryor compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pryor | 2.62 | 38.7 | 11.8% | 30.9% | 11.4% | 1981 | $924 | 20.6% | 90.4% | 6.1% |
| Pryor Creek | 2.66 | 35.7 | 14.3% | 34.6% | 10.6% | 1978 | $1,090 | 20.7% | 92.1% | 10.2% |
| Sportsmen Acres | 2.84 | 39.4 | 13.2% | 23.8% | 9.9% | 1992 | $934 | 21.6% | 90.4% | 6.6% |
| Mazie | 2.40 | 52.0 | 7.8% | 9.5% | 15.7% | 1991 | $722 | 22.8% | 89.7% | 6.8% |
| Chouteau | 2.74 | 38.9 | 12.1% | 24.0% | 11.7% | 1984 | $910 | 19.6% | 86.8% | 8.5% |
| Salina | 2.46 | 42.9 | 10.6% | 23.4% | 18.5% | 1984 | $699 | 15.7% | 91.0% | 9.0% |
| Locust Grove | 2.47 | 43.9 | 10.5% | 27.0% | 14.5% | 1980 | $662 | 16.8% | 89.9% | 4.4% |
| Pin Oak Acres | 2.43 | 51.8 | 7.0% | 16.5% | 13.7% | 1992 | $942 | 19.0% | 91.6% | 11.5% |
| Murphy | 2.26 | 49.8 | 6.7% | 27.4% | 18.2% | 1981 | $737 | 17.1% | 89.0% | 4.5% |
| Foyil | 2.66 | 42.7 | 8.5% | 13.1% | 8.7% | 1995 | $951 | 16.5% | 90.9% | 5.4% |
| Tiawah | 3.00 | 39.0 | 6.4% | 15.5% | 6.8% | 1988 | $1,319 | 21.5% | 89.8% | 1.6% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: West Vero Corridor, FL · Brookdale, NJ · Brookville, OH · Brownfield, TX · Brush Prairie, WA · Buchanan, MI · Bullard, TX · Wells, ME · West Branch, MI · Bristol, IN
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Pryor. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.