Population 151 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of Richloam: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Richloam
Household size in Richloam
| Period | Richloam | Tampa area | Florida | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1.96 | 2.49 | 2.63 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.44 | 2.56 | 2.73 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.97 | 2.59 | 2.75 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.77 | 2.55 | 2.63 | 2.65 |
| Change | +0.81 | +0.06 | +0.00 | −0.03 |
Households in Richloam average 2.77 people, a bit above the national 2.65, so families with children are somewhat more common here. Since 2006–10, household size has climbed from 1.96, but in a place this small, survey estimates can swing a lot from one release to the next.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Richloam
| Period | Richloam | Tampa area | Florida | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 44.7 | 41.2 | 40.8 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 46.3 | 42.3 | 42.0 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 39.6 | 43.2 | 43.0 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 38.3 | 43.1 | 43.5 | 40.1 |
| Change | −6.4 | +1.9 | +2.7 | +2.3 |
Richloam is a little younger than the country as a whole: its median age is 38.3, against 40.1 nationally.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Richloam
| Period | Richloam | Tampa area | Florida | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 3.8% | 12.0% | 12.4% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 6.8% | 11.9% | 12.2% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 14.2% | 11.2% | 11.5% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 10.0% | 10.7% | 11.4% | 11.6% |
| Change | +6.2 pts | −1.3 pts | −1.0 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single-parent households are a bit less common in Richloam than nationally: 10.0%, against 11.6%. The Tampa area as a whole looks much the same.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Richloam
Renters in Richloam
| Period | Richloam | Tampa area | Florida | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 16.6% | 30.3% | 30.3% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 22.9% | 34.7% | 33.9% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 29.2% | 35.1% | 34.6% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 38.6% | 32.1% | 32.4% | 34.8% |
| Change | +22.0 pts | +1.8 pts | +2.1 pts | +1.5 pts |
Nearly four in ten households in Richloam rent their homes (38.6%), a bit above the national share of 34.8%. Among homeowners, 88.8% have no mortgage at all, well above the national share of 39.8%.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Richloam
| Period | Richloam | Tampa area | Florida | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 27.7% | 15.2% | 17.2% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 15.6% | 15.4% | 17.6% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 27.0% | 13.4% | 15.4% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 14.8% | 11.0% | 12.5% | 9.6% |
| Change | −12.9 pts | −4.2 pts | −4.8 pts | −1.8 pts |
Vacant homes make up 14.8% of the housing in Richloam, far above the national rate of 9.6%. In resort and lake areas that usually means seasonal and vacation homes; elsewhere it can point to weak demand.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Richloam
| Period | Richloam | Tampa area | Florida | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1984 | 1982 | 1984 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1986 | 1983 | 1985 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1986 | 1984 | 1986 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1984 | 1988 | 1989 | 1980 |
| Change | +0 | +5 | +5 | +6 |
The housing in Richloam is a little younger than the country's: half of it was built after 1984, against 1980 nationally. The Tampa area as a whole looks much the same.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Richloam
| Period | Richloam | Tampa area | Florida | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $685 | $1,036 | $1,092 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $916 | $1,069 | $1,123 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $975 | $1,244 | $1,323 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $879 | $1,767 | $1,816 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$194 | +$731 | +$724 | +$606 |
Rent in Richloam runs $879 a month at the median, utilities included, well below the U.S. median of $1,571. Rent takes 29.0% of the typical renter's income, just under the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Richloam
Bachelor's degrees in Richloam
| Period | Richloam | Tampa area | Florida | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 16.8% | 26.6% | 26.4% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 13.5% | 27.1% | 27.0% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 8.5% | 30.4% | 30.0% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 10.4% | 35.2% | 34.6% | 35.6% |
| Change | −6.4 pts | +8.6 pts | +8.2 pts | +7.2 pts |
College degrees are relatively uncommon in Richloam: 10.4% of adults 25 and older hold a bachelor's or higher, well below the national share of 35.6%.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Richloam
| Period | Richloam | Tampa area | Florida | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 77.0% | 86.7% | 85.5% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 77.9% | 87.9% | 86.5% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 84.9% | 89.4% | 88.2% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 63.7% | 90.9% | 90.0% | 89.3% |
| Change | −13.3 pts | +4.2 pts | +4.4 pts | +4.3 pts |
More than a third of adults in Richloam never finished high school, well above the national share: only 63.7% have a diploma or equivalent, against 89.3% nationally.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Richloam
| Period | Richloam | Tampa area | Florida | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 13.1% | 8.7% | 8.9% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 11.4% | 10.6% | 11.0% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 4.1% | 5.7% | 5.7% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 9.4% | 4.7% | 4.8% | 5.4% |
| Change | −3.8 pts | −4.1 pts | −4.1 pts | −2.7 pts |
Unemployment in Richloam runs well above the national rate: 9.4% of the labor force was out of work and looking, against 5.4%. Each figure pools five years of surveys (2020–24), so it describes that whole stretch rather than today's job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Richloam compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richloam | 2.77 | 38.3 | 10.0% | 38.6% | 14.8% | 1984 | $879 | 10.4% | 63.7% | 9.4% |
| Ridge Manor | 2.40 | 42.5 | 16.6% | 17.6% | 17.7% | 1990 | $1,037 | 23.1% | 91.9% | 6.0% |
| Webster | 2.66 | 42.4 | 10.0% | 11.3% | 13.3% | 1992 | $1,178 | 17.2% | 86.7% | 1.6% |
| Rdg Mnr Est | 2.22 | 52.2 | 10.3% | 7.6% | 24.3% | 1991 | $1,490 | 20.5% | 87.9% | 0.3% |
| Rerdell | 2.70 | 42.8 | 12.2% | 6.0% | 7.1% | 1987 | $881 | 14.9% | 87.4% | 2.3% |
| Trilby | 2.86 | 39.8 | 8.0% | 14.2% | 11.2% | 1998 | $1,249 | 21.6% | 89.8% | 1.9% |
| Linden | 2.90 | 32.9 | 7.7% | 16.4% | 11.7% | 1989 | $1,005 | 11.9% | 82.0% | 1.6% |
| Bushnell | 2.68 | 44.3 | 10.7% | 19.8% | 15.0% | 1984 | $955 | 16.3% | 82.0% | 6.8% |
| Nobleton | 2.67 | 43.0 | 12.3% | 14.2% | 17.3% | 1985 | $925 | 18.0% | 82.2% | 4.6% |
| Mabel | 3.13 | 39.4 | 8.5% | 19.3% | 11.2% | 1996 | $1,256 | 19.3% | 81.2% | 1.5% |
| Center Hill | 2.96 | 40.9 | 9.0% | 21.9% | 19.1% | 1996 | $955 | 15.6% | 83.1% | 1.4% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Richfield, IL · Nancy Run, WV · Nash, ND · Nashville, IA · Necessity, TX · New Baden, TX · New Dennison, IL · New Frankfort, IN · Ogle, KY · Olney, MO
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Richloam. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.