Rolling Hills Estates, CA Demographics

Population 4,280 · Census ACS 2020–24

Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.

Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Rolling Hills Estates, CA map of median age by neighborhood
Click the map to explore
Younger residents Older residents
Colorblind friendly off

More maps of Rolling Hills Estates: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet

Jump to median age ↓︎

Population and households in Rolling Hills Estates

Household size in Rolling Hills Estates

Household size, people per household
PeriodRolling Hills EstatesLos Angeles areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–102.493.143.042.68
2010–142.543.203.102.73
2015–192.623.163.092.71
2020–242.833.013.012.65
Change+0.34−0.13−0.03−0.03
Show on the map ↑︎

The typical household in Rolling Hills Estates holds 2.83 people, more than the U.S. average of 2.65. Locally, though, the typical household here is smaller than in the wider Los Angeles area, where it has 3.01 people. Since 2006–10, household size has climbed from 2.49, but in a place this small, much of that may be survey noise rather than real change.

Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).

Median age in Rolling Hills Estates

Median age, years
PeriodRolling Hills EstatesLos Angeles areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–1049.035.635.837.7
2010–1450.436.736.838.6
2015–1950.138.037.939.6
2020–2451.439.539.040.1
Change+2.4+4.0+3.1+2.3
Show on the map ↑︎

With a median age of 51.4, Rolling Hills Estates is noticeably older than the country as a whole (40.1), an age mix that tilts toward empty nesters and retirees.

Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).

Single-parent households in Rolling Hills Estates

Single-parent households, % of households
PeriodRolling Hills EstatesLos Angeles areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–104.1%14.3%13.5%12.3%
2010–143.0%14.1%13.5%12.3%
2015–193.8%12.5%12.3%11.6%
2020–243.6%12.3%12.3%11.6%
Change−0.5 pts−2.0 pts−1.2 pts−0.6 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Single-parent households are relatively rare in Rolling Hills Estates: 3.6% of households, against 11.6% nationally.

Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).

Housing in Rolling Hills Estates

Renters in Rolling Hills Estates

Renters, % of occupied homes
PeriodRolling Hills EstatesLos Angeles areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–1015.3%48.8%42.6%33.3%
2010–1414.3%50.8%45.2%35.6%
2015–1916.2%51.4%45.2%36.0%
2020–2425.5%51.6%44.1%34.8%
Change+10.2 pts+2.8 pts+1.5 pts+1.5 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Most households in Rolling Hills Estates own their homes; 25.5% rent, below the national share of 34.8%. Among homeowners, 42.8% have no mortgage at all, about the same as nationally.

Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).

Vacant homes in Rolling Hills Estates

Vacant homes, % of all homes
PeriodRolling Hills EstatesLos Angeles areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–105.6%7.0%8.7%11.4%
2010–145.5%6.7%8.1%11.4%
2015–196.0%6.6%7.5%11.1%
2020–249.8%6.7%7.3%9.6%
Change+4.2 pts−0.3 pts−1.4 pts−1.8 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

About as many homes sit empty in Rolling Hills Estates as nationally: 9.8%, against 9.6%. The rate is higher than in the wider Los Angeles area (6.7%).

Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).

Age of homes in Rolling Hills Estates

Age of homes, median year built
PeriodRolling Hills EstatesLos Angeles areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–101972196519721974
2010–141970196619731975
2015–191972196619741977
2020–241974196919761980
Change+2+4+4+6
Show on the map ↑︎

Housing in Rolling Hills Estates leans a little older: the median home dates to 1974, against 1980 nationally. Even so, homes here are newer than in the Los Angeles area as a whole, where the median home dates to 1969.

Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).

Rent in Rolling Hills Estates

Rent, per month
PeriodRolling Hills EstatesLos Angeles areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–10$1,512$1,328$1,298$965
2010–14$1,701$1,415$1,379$1,040
2015–19$2,547$1,755$1,721$1,213
2020–24$2,853$2,279$2,229$1,571
Change+$1,341+$951+$931+$606
Show on the map ↑︎

The median renter in Rolling Hills Estates pays $2,853 a month for rent and utilities, well above the national median of $1,571. The typical renter here spends 27.0% of household income on rent, just under the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, and a smaller share than renters pay nationally.

Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).

Education in Rolling Hills Estates

Bachelor's degrees in Rolling Hills Estates

Bachelor's degrees, % of adults 25+
PeriodRolling Hills EstatesLos Angeles areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–1063.0%29.7%29.1%28.4%
2010–1461.0%30.7%30.1%29.6%
2015–1962.8%33.7%32.9%32.1%
2020–2468.4%37.6%36.3%35.6%
Change+5.4 pts+7.9 pts+7.1 pts+7.2 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

College graduates are unusually common in Rolling Hills Estates: 68.4% of adults 25 and older have a bachelor's degree or higher, against 35.6% nationally. Education tends to track local incomes and the kinds of jobs nearby.

Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).

High school graduates in Rolling Hills Estates

High school graduates, % of adults 25+
PeriodRolling Hills EstatesLos Angeles areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–1097.6%76.7%79.9%84.9%
2010–1496.7%77.7%80.7%86.1%
2015–1997.4%80.0%82.6%87.7%
2020–2496.5%82.1%84.2%89.3%
Change−1.0 pts+5.4 pts+4.3 pts+4.3 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

High school completion is high in Rolling Hills Estates: 96.5% of adults 25 and older have a diploma or equivalent, well above the national rate of 89.3%.

High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).

Jobs in Rolling Hills Estates

Unemployment, % of the labor force
PeriodRolling Hills EstatesLos Angeles areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–103.6%8.5%9.2%8.1%
2010–145.9%10.6%11.3%9.4%
2015–192.6%5.8%6.3%5.6%
2020–245.4%6.7%6.6%5.4%
Change+1.8 pts−1.7 pts−2.6 pts−2.7 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Unemployment in Rolling Hills Estates is the same as the national rate: 5.4% of the labor force. The rate is lower than in the wider Los Angeles area (6.7%). Each figure pools five years of surveys (2020–24), so it describes that whole stretch rather than today's job market.

Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).

Rolling Hills Estates compared with nearby cities

CityHousehold sizeMedian ageSingle parentsRentersVacant homesMedian year builtMedian rentBachelor's degreeHigh school diplomaUnemployment
Rolling Hills Estates2.8351.43.6%25.5%9.8%1974$2,85368.4%96.5%5.4%
Rolling Hills2.6952.83.5%14.6%8.5%1963$3,45874.5%97.8%7.2%
Rancho Palos Verdes2.6949.84.5%19.5%9.6%1967$3,40471.4%98.2%5.9%
Lomita2.7541.410.0%53.3%8.7%1966$1,98636.6%86.8%4.5%
Palos Verdes Estates2.6252.72.3%7.1%10.5%1965$3,17479.9%97.7%4.2%
Harbor City2.9338.514.8%49.8%5.1%1976$1,79031.8%83.2%7.9%
San Pedro2.6341.912.9%58.0%5.4%1963$1,95732.0%84.4%6.4%
Torrance2.7142.48.5%47.7%7.7%1964$2,47850.1%93.0%6.2%
Wilmington3.4936.118.9%56.5%4.3%1965$1,72313.4%63.4%7.0%
West Carson2.6345.48.0%29.7%5.5%1973$2,06437.6%86.4%5.5%
Redondo Beach2.5342.96.7%46.2%9.1%1971$2,71666.4%96.3%5.5%

All figures 2020–24.

Cities with similar populations: Vieques, PR · Royal City, WA · Gothenburg, NE · Newport, MN · Frontenac, MO · Holiday City South, NJ · Coleman, MI · Chase City, VA · Cayuga Heights, NY · Carthage, TN

About these numbers

Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Rolling Hills Estates. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.

No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.