Population 319 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of Stansbury Park: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Stansbury Park
Household size in Stansbury Park
| Period | Stansbury Park | Salt Lake City area | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 3.28 | 3.13 | 3.21 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 3.52 | 3.17 | 3.28 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 4.01 | 3.14 | 3.25 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 3.57 | 2.95 | 3.11 | 2.65 |
| Change | +0.29 | −0.17 | −0.09 | −0.03 |
Households in Stansbury Park are large by national standards, averaging 3.57 people against 2.65 for the U.S. That usually means more families with children at home. Since 2006–10, household size has climbed from 3.28, but in a place this small, much of that may be survey noise rather than real change.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Stansbury Park
| Period | Stansbury Park | Salt Lake City area | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 34.7 | 30.9 | 29.9 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 29.5 | 32.1 | 30.8 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 34.8 | 33.3 | 32.0 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 32.3 | 34.8 | 33.1 | 40.1 |
| Change | −2.4 | +3.9 | +3.2 | +2.3 |
With a median age of just 32.3, Stansbury Park is far younger than the country as a whole (40.1), a population that tilts toward young families with children.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Stansbury Park
| Period | Stansbury Park | Salt Lake City area | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 9.4% | 10.1% | 9.1% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 8.3% | 10.9% | 9.6% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 6.2% | 10.7% | 9.3% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 6.0% | 10.2% | 8.9% | 11.6% |
| Change | −3.4 pts | +0.1 pts | −0.2 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single-parent households are relatively rare in Stansbury Park: 6.0% of households, against 11.6% nationally.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Stansbury Park
Renters in Stansbury Park
| Period | Stansbury Park | Salt Lake City area | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 13.7% | 31.1% | 28.8% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 9.6% | 32.9% | 30.3% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 10.0% | 32.2% | 29.8% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 12.4% | 33.0% | 29.8% | 34.8% |
| Change | −1.3 pts | +1.9 pts | +0.9 pts | +1.5 pts |
Only 12.4% of households in Stansbury Park rent their homes, far below the national share of 34.8%, so most residents are owners who tend to stay put. Among homeowners, 20.5% have no mortgage at all, well below the national share of 39.8%.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Stansbury Park
| Period | Stansbury Park | Salt Lake City area | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.1% | 7.0% | 8.7% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 8.2% | 6.7% | 8.3% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 4.9% | 6.0% | 8.0% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 4.1% | 6.1% | 7.3% | 9.6% |
| Change | +2.0 pts | −0.9 pts | −1.4 pts | −1.8 pts |
Only 4.1% of homes in Stansbury Park are vacant, far below the national rate of 9.6%, which usually means strong demand for housing.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Stansbury Park
| Period | Stansbury Park | Salt Lake City area | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1985 | 1980 | 1984 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1998 | 1982 | 1985 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1997 | 1983 | 1987 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 2007 | 1987 | 1991 | 1980 |
| Change | +22 | +7 | +8 | +6 |
Much of the housing in Stansbury Park is relatively new: half of its homes were built after 2007, compared with 1980 for the U.S. as a whole.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Stansbury Park
| Period | Stansbury Park | Salt Lake City area | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $1,749 | $1,067 | $971 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $1,911 | $1,131 | $1,064 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $1,085 | $1,296 | $1,222 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $1,231 | $1,796 | $1,701 | $1,571 |
| Change | −$518 | +$729 | +$729 | +$606 |
A typical rental in Stansbury Park costs $1,231 a month with utilities, well below the national median of $1,571. The typical renter here spends 26.6% of household income on rent, comfortably under the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, and a smaller share than renters pay nationally.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Stansbury Park
Bachelor's degrees in Stansbury Park
| Period | Stansbury Park | Salt Lake City area | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 9.0% | 28.8% | 29.7% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 28.0% | 30.3% | 31.2% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 23.6% | 34.3% | 34.3% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 31.8% | 37.9% | 38.3% | 35.6% |
| Change | +22.7 pts | +9.1 pts | +8.6 pts | +7.2 pts |
Nearly a third of adults 25 and older in Stansbury Park (31.8%) have a bachelor's degree or higher, a little below the national share of 35.6%.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Stansbury Park
| Period | Stansbury Park | Salt Lake City area | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 85.0% | 89.0% | 91.1% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 83.5% | 89.5% | 91.5% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 79.1% | 90.9% | 92.6% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 94.9% | 91.7% | 93.5% | 89.3% |
| Change | +9.9 pts | +2.6 pts | +2.4 pts | +4.3 pts |
High school completion is high in Stansbury Park: 94.9% of adults 25 and older have a diploma or equivalent, well above the national rate of 89.3%.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Stansbury Park
| Period | Stansbury Park | Salt Lake City area | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.6% | 6.0% | 5.8% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 4.4% | 7.0% | 6.8% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 2.1% | 3.6% | 3.6% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 1.0% | 3.8% | 3.5% | 5.4% |
| Change | −1.6 pts | −2.2 pts | −2.3 pts | −2.7 pts |
Unemployment in Stansbury Park has been low: just 1.0% of the labor force was out of work and looking, well below the national rate of 5.4%. Because the Census pools five years of responses (2020–24), these rates smooth over short swings and lag the current job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Stansbury Park compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stansbury Park | 3.57 | 32.3 | 6.0% | 12.4% | 4.1% | 2007 | $1,231 | 31.8% | 94.9% | 1.0% |
| Lake Point | 3.80 | 27.9 | 4.2% | 15.0% | 3.1% | 2007 | $1,235 | 31.3% | 95.9% | 1.1% |
| Tooele | 3.35 | 32.8 | 12.1% | 17.0% | 3.6% | 1996 | $1,466 | 24.8% | 92.3% | 3.6% |
| Lincoln | 4.34 | 36.5 | 2.7% | 2.7% | 2.8% | 2000 | $1,238 | 24.9% | 93.3% | 3.2% |
| Erda | 3.27 | 37.6 | 12.0% | 7.0% | 3.1% | 2008 | $2,061 | 25.9% | 93.7% | 13.3% |
| Grantsville | 3.68 | 32.0 | 15.5% | 17.5% | 6.0% | 1997 | $1,258 | 21.6% | 92.2% | 4.1% |
| Magna | 3.29 | 34.0 | 20.2% | 21.2% | 4.1% | 1983 | $1,611 | 13.5% | 86.9% | 3.9% |
| Bingham Canyon | 3.31 | 32.7 | 16.3% | 20.5% | 3.5% | 1980 | $1,744 | 22.2% | 90.8% | 6.1% |
| Copperton | 3.81 | 31.1 | 9.1% | 15.7% | 8.5% | 1985 | $1,829 | 40.3% | 91.8% | 4.1% |
| Kearns | 3.49 | 32.6 | 18.7% | 16.0% | 2.9% | 1975 | $1,680 | 13.0% | 79.4% | 6.1% |
| Stockton | 3.49 | 37.5 | 4.1% | 5.1% | 5.7% | 2006 | $1,583 | 21.8% | 97.3% | 2.0% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Marion, ND · Little Marsh, PA · Locke, AR · Lockhart Flats, VA · Lone Grove, TX · Lone Pine, LA · Long Rock, TN · Longtown, MO · Longwoods, MD · Lorenzo, ID
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Stansbury Park. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.