Population 119 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of Strong: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Strong
Household size in Strong
| Period | Strong | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.41 | 2.51 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.29 | 2.53 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.27 | 2.50 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.40 | 2.46 | 2.65 |
| Change | −0.02 | −0.05 | −0.03 |
Strong is a place of small households, averaging 2.40 people against 2.65 for the U.S., which points to many singles, couples and roommates and relatively few children. The picture is much the same across Pennsylvania.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Strong
| Period | Strong | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 45.5 | 40.3 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 51.2 | 41.0 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 46.7 | 41.8 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 53.7 | 42.0 | 40.1 |
| Change | +8.2 | +1.7 | +2.3 |
Strong skews older: half of its residents are older than 53.7, well above the national median of 40.1. That usually means more empty nesters and retirees, and fewer young families. The median age has climbed from 45.5 in 2006–10, but in a place this small, much of that may be survey noise rather than real change.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Strong
| Period | Strong | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 7.3% | 10.5% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 3.2% | 10.6% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 12.1% | 10.5% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 6.0% | 10.7% | 11.6% |
| Change | −1.3 pts | +0.2 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single-parent households are relatively rare in Strong: 6.0% of households, against 11.6% nationally.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Strong
Renters in Strong
| Period | Strong | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 19.5% | 29.0% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 32.4% | 30.5% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 26.3% | 31.1% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 12.6% | 30.7% | 34.8% |
| Change | −6.9 pts | +1.7 pts | +1.5 pts |
Strong is overwhelmingly a place of homeowners: only 12.6% of households rent, far below the national share of 34.8%. Owner-heavy areas like this tend to see less turnover. Nearly half of owners (47.9%) have paid off their mortgages, above the national share of 39.8%.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Strong
| Period | Strong | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 14.0% | 10.3% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 16.2% | 10.5% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 10.9% | 10.7% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 18.5% | 9.1% | 9.6% |
| Change | +4.4 pts | −1.2 pts | −1.8 pts |
Vacant homes make up 18.5% of the housing in Strong, far above the national rate of 9.6%. In resort and lake areas that usually means seasonal and vacation homes; elsewhere it can point to weak demand.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Strong
| Period | Strong | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1938 | 1963 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1977 | 1964 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1969 | 1965 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1974 | 1967 | 1980 |
| Change | +36 | +4 | +6 |
Housing in Strong leans a little older: the median home dates to 1974, against 1980 nationally. Still, homes here are newer than in Pennsylvania as a whole, where the median home dates to 1967.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Strong
| Period | Strong | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $313 | $829 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $1,497 | $923 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $374 | $1,039 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $948 | $1,323 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$635 | +$494 | +$606 |
A typical rental in Strong costs $948 a month with utilities, well below the national median of $1,571. Rent takes 22.9% of the typical renter's income, comfortably under the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Strong
Bachelor's degrees in Strong
| Period | Strong | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 15.0% | 27.2% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 12.9% | 28.7% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 12.4% | 31.8% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 23.7% | 35.6% | 35.6% |
| Change | +8.7 pts | +8.3 pts | +7.2 pts |
Fewer adults in Strong have a four-year degree than in the country as a whole: 23.7%, against 35.6% nationally.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Strong
| Period | Strong | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 82.2% | 87.3% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 86.7% | 88.8% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 90.7% | 90.3% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 91.4% | 91.8% | 89.3% |
| Change | +9.2 pts | +4.5 pts | +4.3 pts |
About nine in ten adults in Strong have finished high school (91.4%), a bit above the national rate of 89.3%. The picture is much the same across Pennsylvania.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Strong
| Period | Strong | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 9.5% | 7.5% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 10.7% | 8.8% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 2.6% | 5.5% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 5.8% | 5.4% | 5.4% |
| Change | −3.6 pts | −2.1 pts | −2.7 pts |
Unemployment in Strong is close to the national rate: 5.8% of the labor force, against 5.4%. Each figure pools five years of surveys (2020–24), so it describes that whole stretch rather than today's job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Strong compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strong | 2.40 | 53.7 | 6.0% | 12.6% | 18.5% | 1974 | $948 | 23.7% | 91.4% | 5.8% |
| Mount Carmel | 2.40 | 43.2 | 14.6% | 20.7% | 24.6% | 1940 | $813 | 17.4% | 91.1% | 6.7% |
| Marion Heights | 2.11 | 47.1 | 21.4% | 23.9% | 24.0% | 1940 | $1,114 | 10.1% | 91.7% | 2.6% |
| Kulpmont | 2.07 | 54.7 | 10.9% | 19.4% | 11.1% | 1952 | $778 | 16.4% | 90.6% | 5.5% |
| Locust Gap | 2.43 | 55.4 | 3.3% | 13.1% | 17.7% | 1980 | $960 | 24.0% | 90.5% | 5.2% |
| Diamondtown | 2.20 | 47.2 | 18.0% | 9.4% | 20.7% | 1941 | $847 | 22.8% | 93.4% | 9.0% |
| Natalie | 2.24 | 44.9 | 19.7% | 10.3% | 22.6% | 1942 | $883 | 22.2% | 96.0% | 9.3% |
| Wilburton | 2.05 | 56.5 | 10.1% | 6.1% | 12.1% | 1940 | $702 | 25.9% | 82.0% | 7.0% |
| Mowry | 2.55 | 43.8 | 8.2% | 14.4% | 9.7% | 1959 | $759 | 6.6% | 83.2% | 0.0% |
| Fisherdale | 2.61 | 50.0 | 5.9% | 4.8% | 12.0% | 1973 | $825 | 22.8% | 97.5% | 9.5% |
| Wilburton Number Two | 2.02 | 57.9 | 10.4% | 5.4% | 12.0% | 1938 | $677 | 25.8% | 81.3% | 7.5% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Smiths Park, SD · Larkin, AR · Lewis and Clark Village, MO · Sikesville, AL · Silica, KS · Silverwood, LA · Slana, AK · Slapneck, MI · Slater, WY · Slateville, NY
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Strong. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.