Population 554 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of Sugar Ridge: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Sugar Ridge
Household size in Sugar Ridge
| Period | Sugar Ridge | Toledo area | Ohio | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.85 | 2.46 | 2.51 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.97 | 2.45 | 2.51 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.71 | 2.40 | 2.47 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.61 | 2.39 | 2.46 | 2.65 |
| Change | −0.24 | −0.08 | −0.05 | −0.03 |
At 2.61 people per household, Sugar Ridge sits close to the national average of 2.65. The typical household here is bigger than in the Toledo area overall, where it has 2.39 people. Household size has dropped from 2.85 in 2006–10, but in a place this small, much of that may be survey noise rather than real change.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Sugar Ridge
| Period | Sugar Ridge | Toledo area | Ohio | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 34.9 | 37.9 | 39.0 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 34.5 | 38.5 | 40.0 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 35.3 | 39.6 | 40.7 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 39.8 | 39.9 | 40.8 | 40.1 |
| Change | +4.8 | +1.9 | +1.8 | +2.3 |
Half of the people in Sugar Ridge are younger than 39.8 and half are older, close to the national median of 40.1.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Sugar Ridge
| Period | Sugar Ridge | Toledo area | Ohio | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 4.3% | 12.5% | 11.7% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 5.2% | 13.0% | 11.9% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 6.9% | 13.2% | 11.7% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 4.7% | 12.9% | 11.7% | 11.6% |
| Change | +0.4 pts | +0.4 pts | −0.0 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single-parent households are relatively rare in Sugar Ridge: 4.7% of households, against 11.6% nationally.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Sugar Ridge
Renters in Sugar Ridge
| Period | Sugar Ridge | Toledo area | Ohio | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 14.8% | 33.1% | 30.8% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 18.9% | 36.1% | 33.1% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 16.6% | 37.9% | 33.9% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 15.0% | 36.3% | 32.8% | 34.8% |
| Change | +0.2 pts | +3.2 pts | +2.0 pts | +1.5 pts |
Only 15.0% of households in Sugar Ridge rent their homes, far below the national share of 34.8%, so most residents are owners who tend to stay put. Among homeowners, 43.7% have no mortgage at all, above the national share of 39.8%.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Sugar Ridge
| Period | Sugar Ridge | Toledo area | Ohio | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 7.8% | 10.6% | 10.8% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 7.9% | 10.8% | 10.8% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 10.8% | 10.1% | 10.2% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 9.8% | 8.8% | 8.7% | 9.6% |
| Change | +2.1 pts | −1.8 pts | −2.2 pts | −1.8 pts |
About as many homes sit empty in Sugar Ridge as nationally: 9.8%, against 9.6%.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Sugar Ridge
| Period | Sugar Ridge | Toledo area | Ohio | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1975 | 1965 | 1968 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1977 | 1965 | 1969 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1983 | 1967 | 1970 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1984 | 1969 | 1972 | 1980 |
| Change | +9 | +4 | +4 | +6 |
The housing in Sugar Ridge is a little younger than the country's: half of it was built after 1984, against 1980 nationally.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Sugar Ridge
| Period | Sugar Ridge | Toledo area | Ohio | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $932 | $725 | $765 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $940 | $748 | $814 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $1,132 | $862 | $901 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $1,365 | $1,055 | $1,142 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$433 | +$330 | +$377 | +$606 |
Rent in Sugar Ridge runs $1,365 a month at the median, utilities included, below the U.S. median of $1,571. Still, rents here are higher than in the Toledo area as a whole ($1,055). Rent takes 26.9% of the typical renter's income, comfortably under the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Sugar Ridge
Bachelor's degrees in Sugar Ridge
| Period | Sugar Ridge | Toledo area | Ohio | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 21.5% | 24.9% | 25.4% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 26.8% | 26.0% | 26.5% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 37.1% | 27.7% | 28.9% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 39.1% | 30.9% | 31.9% | 35.6% |
| Change | +17.6 pts | +6.0 pts | +6.5 pts | +7.2 pts |
About four in ten adults 25 and older in Sugar Ridge (39.1%) have a bachelor's degree or higher, a bit above the national share of 35.6%.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Sugar Ridge
| Period | Sugar Ridge | Toledo area | Ohio | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 89.9% | 88.8% | 87.7% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 96.7% | 89.6% | 88.9% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 95.3% | 90.5% | 90.4% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 98.2% | 92.3% | 91.7% | 89.3% |
| Change | +8.3 pts | +3.5 pts | +4.0 pts | +4.3 pts |
Finishing high school is nearly universal in Sugar Ridge: 98.2% of adults 25 and older have a diploma or equivalent, well above the national rate of 89.3%.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Sugar Ridge
| Period | Sugar Ridge | Toledo area | Ohio | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 5.6% | 11.2% | 8.7% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 9.7% | 11.4% | 9.4% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 4.2% | 6.7% | 5.5% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 2.5% | 5.9% | 4.9% | 5.4% |
| Change | −3.1 pts | −5.3 pts | −3.8 pts | −2.7 pts |
The job market in Sugar Ridge has been strong: just 2.5% of the labor force was out of work and looking, well below the national rate of 5.4%. Because the Census pools five years of responses (2020–24), these rates smooth over short swings and lag the current job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Sugar Ridge compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sugar Ridge | 2.61 | 39.8 | 4.7% | 15.0% | 9.8% | 1984 | $1,365 | 39.1% | 98.2% | 2.5% |
| Hull Prairie | 2.50 | 34.9 | 11.1% | 0.9% | 9.0% | 1997 | $1,020 | 55.6% | 99.8% | 11.1% |
| Scotch Ridge | 2.31 | 52.0 | 6.9% | 20.1% | 5.4% | 1963 | $970 | 35.9% | 99.8% | 1.6% |
| Haskins | 2.67 | 39.5 | 3.4% | 14.2% | 7.1% | 1999 | $1,561 | 47.7% | 96.9% | 2.7% |
| Bowling Green | 2.11 | 31.3 | 7.8% | 60.4% | 7.4% | 1979 | $981 | 41.0% | 94.5% | 5.8% |
| Stony Ridge | 2.53 | 40.2 | 5.7% | 32.0% | 7.8% | 1973 | $1,281 | 20.8% | 97.6% | 3.1% |
| Perrysburg | 2.44 | 40.7 | 5.5% | 34.1% | 6.0% | 1989 | $1,366 | 51.0% | 96.8% | 3.8% |
| Luckey | 2.39 | 49.4 | 8.0% | 31.8% | 11.1% | 1969 | $1,335 | 22.6% | 96.6% | 0.5% |
| Lime City | 1.95 | 60.0 | 8.1% | 36.3% | 18.0% | 1975 | $1,155 | 18.1% | 88.3% | 2.2% |
| Pemberville | 2.46 | 43.7 | 9.7% | 23.3% | 7.4% | 1961 | $1,091 | 28.5% | 95.8% | 2.8% |
| Tontogany | 2.75 | 45.5 | 2.3% | 6.2% | 4.3% | 1980 | $964 | 37.0% | 98.7% | 4.3% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Stanley, NM · Gypsum, NY · Hagewood, LA · Hammon, OK · Hatton, KY · Igo, CA · Shelby, WI · Sheppards, GA · South Liberty, TN · South Londonderry, VT
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Sugar Ridge. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.