Population 520 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of Tanner: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Tanner
Household size in Tanner
| Period | Tanner | Seattle area | Washington | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.43 | 2.52 | 2.56 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.69 | 2.59 | 2.62 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.69 | 2.62 | 2.62 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 3.01 | 2.60 | 2.61 | 2.65 |
| Change | +0.58 | +0.09 | +0.05 | −0.03 |
Households in Tanner are large by national standards, averaging 3.01 people against 2.65 for the U.S. That usually means more families with children at home. Since 2006–10, household size has climbed from 2.43, but in a place this small, much of that may be survey noise rather than real change.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Tanner
| Period | Tanner | Seattle area | Washington | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 43.6 | 37.5 | 38.0 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 43.4 | 38.1 | 38.7 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 43.5 | 38.5 | 39.3 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 41.5 | 38.8 | 39.6 | 40.1 |
| Change | −2.1 | +1.3 | +1.6 | +2.3 |
At 41.5, the median age in Tanner is close to the national median of 40.1, so its age mix looks much like the country's. The population here is older than in the wider Seattle area, where the median age is 38.8.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Tanner
| Period | Tanner | Seattle area | Washington | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 6.0% | 10.3% | 10.9% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 12.4% | 10.0% | 10.6% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 2.2% | 9.2% | 10.1% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 7.5% | 9.1% | 10.1% | 11.6% |
| Change | +1.5 pts | −1.2 pts | −0.8 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single parents head only 7.5% of households in Tanner, well below the national share of 11.6%.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Tanner
Renters in Tanner
| Period | Tanner | Seattle area | Washington | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 12.1% | 37.7% | 35.2% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 13.7% | 40.0% | 37.3% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 11.8% | 39.9% | 37.0% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 4.5% | 40.0% | 36.2% | 34.8% |
| Change | −7.5 pts | +2.3 pts | +1.0 pts | +1.5 pts |
Tanner is overwhelmingly a place of homeowners: only 4.5% of households rent, far below the national share of 34.8%. Owner-heavy areas like this tend to see less turnover. Among homeowners, 22.9% have no mortgage at all, well below the national share of 39.8%.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Tanner
| Period | Tanner | Seattle area | Washington | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 22.5% | 7.9% | 9.2% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 35.6% | 7.8% | 9.2% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 29.0% | 6.8% | 8.2% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 37.6% | 6.6% | 7.6% | 9.6% |
| Change | +15.2 pts | −1.3 pts | −1.6 pts | −1.8 pts |
Vacant homes make up 37.6% of the housing in Tanner, far above the national rate of 9.6%. In resort and lake areas that usually means seasonal and vacation homes; elsewhere it can point to weak demand.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Tanner
| Period | Tanner | Seattle area | Washington | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1982 | 1977 | 1977 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1981 | 1978 | 1979 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1989 | 1980 | 1980 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1982 | 1983 | 1984 | 1980 |
| Change | +0 | +7 | +6 | +6 |
The typical home in Tanner was built around 1982, about the same vintage as the country's housing overall (1980).
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Tanner
| Period | Tanner | Seattle area | Washington | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $1,049 | $1,162 | $1,018 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $1,021 | $1,284 | $1,127 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $2,109 | $1,644 | $1,390 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $2,416 | $2,193 | $1,875 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$1,367 | +$1,031 | +$858 | +$606 |
The median renter in Tanner pays $2,416 a month for rent and utilities, well above the national median of $1,571. Rent takes 39.1% of the typical renter's income, well over the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, so many renters here are stretched.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Tanner
Bachelor's degrees in Tanner
| Period | Tanner | Seattle area | Washington | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 39.1% | 36.7% | 31.0% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 40.8% | 38.0% | 32.1% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 58.0% | 42.3% | 35.5% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 52.6% | 46.3% | 38.8% | 35.6% |
| Change | +13.5 pts | +9.6 pts | +7.8 pts | +7.2 pts |
Tanner is highly educated: just over half of adults 25 and older (52.6%) hold at least a bachelor's degree, far above the national share of 35.6%.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Tanner
| Period | Tanner | Seattle area | Washington | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 96.8% | 91.3% | 89.5% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 94.5% | 91.6% | 90.0% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 98.3% | 92.5% | 91.0% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 98.2% | 93.1% | 91.9% | 89.3% |
| Change | +1.5 pts | +1.8 pts | +2.4 pts | +4.3 pts |
Finishing high school is nearly universal in Tanner: 98.2% of adults 25 and older have a diploma or equivalent, well above the national rate of 89.3%.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Tanner
| Period | Tanner | Seattle area | Washington | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 4.9% | 6.9% | 7.6% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 1.7% | 8.3% | 8.9% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 2.2% | 4.5% | 5.1% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 2.7% | 5.0% | 5.1% | 5.4% |
| Change | −2.2 pts | −2.0 pts | −2.5 pts | −2.7 pts |
Unemployment in Tanner has been low: just 2.7% of the labor force was out of work and looking, well below the national rate of 5.4%. Because the Census pools five years of responses (2020–24), these rates smooth over short swings and lag the current job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Tanner compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tanner | 3.01 | 41.5 | 7.5% | 4.5% | 37.6% | 1982 | $2,416 | 52.6% | 98.2% | 2.7% |
| North Bend | 2.80 | 40.3 | 5.7% | 16.8% | 11.3% | 1989 | $2,547 | 57.2% | 96.8% | 2.6% |
| Ellisville | 2.33 | 51.8 | 2.1% | 11.0% | 16.2% | 1979 | $2,713 | 55.4% | 99.1% | 0.7% |
| Snoqualmie | 2.94 | 40.0 | 7.2% | 15.7% | 6.6% | 1999 | $3,024 | 65.5% | 98.5% | 2.1% |
| Spring Glen | 2.42 | 50.0 | 4.3% | 10.0% | 15.6% | 1986 | $2,205 | 58.0% | 97.7% | 0.0% |
| Selleck | 2.45 | 47.4 | 2.9% | 6.0% | 5.7% | 1985 | $1,386 | 25.6% | 97.0% | 3.0% |
| Upper Preston | 2.63 | 45.0 | 4.4% | 8.5% | 5.0% | 1986 | $2,313 | 58.1% | 89.7% | 9.5% |
| Fall City | 2.72 | 44.5 | 3.6% | 8.8% | 6.8% | 1988 | $2,764 | 66.3% | 98.0% | 2.9% |
| Kangley | 2.74 | 45.0 | 2.5% | 6.6% | 5.1% | 1989 | $1,386 | 30.6% | 93.7% | 2.7% |
| Preston | 2.13 | 51.1 | 7.9% | 2.7% | 2.1% | 1990 | $3,292 | 71.3% | 99.4% | 0.5% |
| Ravensdale | 3.06 | 40.5 | 4.3% | 11.4% | 4.1% | 1996 | $1,729 | 44.9% | 91.5% | 2.8% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Warlock, TX · Fargo, NY · Fontana, WI · Forbestown, CA · Weston, NE · West Wardsboro, VT · West Sebewa, MI · West Levant, ME · Wendell, MN · Weldon, IL
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Tanner. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.