Population 5,304 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
More maps of Taylor Creek: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Taylor Creek
Household size in Taylor Creek
| Period | Taylor Creek | Florida | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.31 | 2.63 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.29 | 2.73 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.21 | 2.75 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.17 | 2.63 | 2.65 |
| Change | −0.13 | +0.00 | −0.03 |
Households in Taylor Creek are small: just 2.17 people on average, compared with 2.65 nationally. That is typical of places where many people live alone or as couples, and fewer have children at home. Since 2006–10, household size has dropped from 2.31, a much bigger shift than nationally.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Taylor Creek
| Period | Taylor Creek | Florida | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 47.3 | 40.8 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 53.6 | 42.0 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 53.7 | 43.0 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 49.6 | 43.5 | 40.1 |
| Change | +2.3 | +2.7 | +2.3 |
Taylor Creek skews older: half of its residents are older than 49.6, well above the national median of 40.1. That usually means more empty nesters and retirees, and fewer young families. The median age has climbed from 47.3 in 2006–10, as it has nationally.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Taylor Creek
| Period | Taylor Creek | Florida | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 10.9% | 12.4% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 12.4% | 12.2% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 8.5% | 11.5% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 9.7% | 11.4% | 11.6% |
| Change | −1.3 pts | −1.0 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single-parent households are a bit less common in Taylor Creek than nationally: 9.7%, against 11.6%. The single-parent share is down 1.3 points from 2006–10, mirroring the country.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Taylor Creek
Renters in Taylor Creek
| Period | Taylor Creek | Florida | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 26.3% | 30.3% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 27.5% | 33.9% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 30.1% | 34.6% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 30.7% | 32.4% | 34.8% |
| Change | +4.5 pts | +2.1 pts | +1.5 pts |
About three in ten households in Taylor Creek rent their homes (30.7%), a little below the national share of 34.8%; the rest own. Among homeowners, 71.3% have no mortgage at all, well above the national share of 39.8%. Renting is most common in the southeast and least common in the west. The renter share is up 4.5 points from 2006–10, a much bigger shift than nationally.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Taylor Creek
| Period | Taylor Creek | Florida | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 37.4% | 17.2% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 39.1% | 17.6% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 26.6% | 15.4% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 23.6% | 12.5% | 9.6% |
| Change | −13.8 pts | −4.8 pts | −1.8 pts |
Vacant homes make up 23.6% of the housing in Taylor Creek, far above the national rate of 9.6%. In resort and lake areas that usually means seasonal and vacation homes; elsewhere it can point to weak demand. Vacancy has fallen 13.8 points since 2006–10, a much bigger shift than nationally.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Taylor Creek
| Period | Taylor Creek | Florida | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1981 | 1984 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1986 | 1985 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1984 | 1986 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1988 | 1989 | 1980 |
| Change | +6 | +5 | +6 |
The housing in Taylor Creek is younger than the country's: half of it was built after 1988, against 1980 nationally. That is in line with the rest of Florida. The median year built has moved up from 1981 in 2006–10, a sign of steady new building.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Taylor Creek
| Period | Taylor Creek | Florida | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $860 | $1,092 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $802 | $1,123 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $802 | $1,323 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $1,613 | $1,816 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$752 | +$724 | +$606 |
The median renter in Taylor Creek pays $1,613 a month for rent and utilities, close to the national median of $1,571. Rents here are lower than in Florida overall ($1,816). Rents are up $752 a month from 2006–10, an 87% jump, faster than rents rose nationally. Rent takes 28.1% of the typical renter's income, just under the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Taylor Creek
Bachelor's degrees in Taylor Creek
| Period | Taylor Creek | Florida | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 12.1% | 26.4% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 9.8% | 27.0% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 11.6% | 30.0% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 8.9% | 34.6% | 35.6% |
| Change | −3.2 pts | +8.2 pts | +7.2 pts |
Fewer adults in Taylor Creek have a four-year degree than in the country as a whole: 8.9%, against 35.6% nationally. Since 2006–10, the share with a degree has fallen 3.2 points, even as the national share rose. Of the 512 Florida cities with 5,000+ people, only three have a lower share of college graduates.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Taylor Creek
| Period | Taylor Creek | Florida | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 73.2% | 85.5% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 72.9% | 86.5% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 86.0% | 88.2% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 74.7% | 90.0% | 89.3% |
| Change | +1.5 pts | +4.4 pts | +4.3 pts |
About a quarter of adults in Taylor Creek never finished high school, well above the national share: only 74.7% have a diploma or equivalent, against 89.3% nationally. The share with a diploma has risen 1.5 points since 2006–10, as it has nationally. Only 18 of the 512 Florida cities with 5,000+ people have a lower share of high school graduates.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Taylor Creek
| Period | Taylor Creek | Florida | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 11.4% | 8.9% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 14.1% | 11.0% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 6.2% | 5.7% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 7.8% | 4.8% | 5.4% |
| Change | −3.6 pts | −4.1 pts | −2.7 pts |
Finding work has been harder in Taylor Creek: 7.8% of the labor force was out of work and looking, well above the national rate of 5.4%. Only 41 of the 512 Florida cities with 5,000+ people have higher unemployment. Unemployment is down 3.6 points from 2006–10, mirroring the country.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Taylor Creek compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Creek | 2.17 | 49.6 | 9.7% | 30.7% | 23.6% | 1988 | $1,613 | 8.9% | 74.7% | 7.8% |
| Okeechobee | 2.68 | 42.0 | 13.7% | 24.7% | 18.4% | 1989 | $1,032 | 16.4% | 80.5% | 4.3% |
| Port Mayaca | 2.21 | 39.8 | 6.2% | 25.0% | 27.9% | 1993 | $841 | 8.0% | 73.6% | 6.9% |
| Port St. Lucie | 2.83 | 45.6 | 11.7% | 16.4% | 9.0% | 2001 | $2,003 | 27.7% | 91.5% | 5.7% |
| Palm City | 2.56 | 50.4 | 4.3% | 9.1% | 11.6% | 1995 | $2,285 | 47.7% | 96.8% | 4.6% |
| Indian River Estates | 2.68 | 45.9 | 10.2% | 9.7% | 7.3% | 1987 | $1,889 | 20.4% | 92.9% | 7.1% |
| Jensen Beach | 2.32 | 51.7 | 4.5% | 25.5% | 20.0% | 1989 | $1,959 | 39.6% | 94.8% | 6.3% |
| Ankona | 1.73 | 72.0 | 2.9% | 6.8% | 46.2% | 1994 | $1,411 | 45.3% | 96.1% | 2.5% |
| Stuart | 2.43 | 51.8 | 9.4% | 26.7% | 17.8% | 1985 | $1,634 | 34.0% | 92.0% | 3.8% |
| Ocean Breeze Park | 2.46 | 45.1 | 4.9% | 26.7% | 17.8% | 1976 | $2,041 | 22.4% | 94.5% | 4.6% |
| Lake Placid | 2.29 | 51.8 | 8.5% | 18.9% | 20.2% | 1987 | $1,101 | 20.7% | 83.6% | 8.5% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Adams, TN · Awendaw, SC · Nunica, MI · Northvale, NJ · Northwest Harbor, NY · Norway, ME · Nottingham, NH · Novelty, OH · Nowata, OK · Noyack, NY
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Taylor Creek. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.