Population 490 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of Turah: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Turah
Household size in Turah
| Period | Turah | Montana | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.26 | 2.41 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.24 | 2.45 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.48 | 2.44 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.43 | 2.44 | 2.65 |
| Change | +0.17 | +0.03 | −0.03 |
The average household in Turah has 2.43 people, under the U.S. average of 2.65. The picture is much the same across Montana. Since 2006–10, household size has climbed from 2.26, but in a place this small, much of that may be survey noise rather than real change.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Turah
| Period | Turah | Montana | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 50.0 | 39.9 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 52.1 | 40.8 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 52.0 | 41.5 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 49.7 | 41.5 | 40.1 |
| Change | −0.3 | +1.6 | +2.3 |
Turah skews older: half of its residents are older than 49.7, well above the national median of 40.1. That usually means more empty nesters and retirees, and fewer young families.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Turah
| Period | Turah | Montana | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 4.1% | 9.4% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 9.2% | 9.8% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 4.7% | 8.7% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 8.7% | 8.8% | 11.6% |
| Change | +4.6 pts | −0.6 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single parents head about one in twelve households in Turah (8.7%), below the national share of 11.6%. Montana as a whole looks much the same.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Turah
Renters in Turah
| Period | Turah | Montana | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 29.0% | 31.0% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 21.7% | 32.3% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 24.1% | 31.9% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 19.3% | 30.8% | 34.8% |
| Change | −9.7 pts | −0.1 pts | +1.5 pts |
Turah is largely a place of homeowners: only 19.3% of households rent, far below the national share of 34.8%. Owner-heavy areas like this tend to see less turnover. Nearly six in ten owners (56.7%) have paid off their mortgages, well above the national share of 39.8%.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Turah
| Period | Turah | Montana | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 42.2% | 13.2% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 41.4% | 13.9% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 41.2% | 14.1% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 17.5% | 12.2% | 9.6% |
| Change | −24.7 pts | −0.9 pts | −1.8 pts |
Vacant homes make up 17.5% of the housing in Turah, far above the national rate of 9.6%. In resort and lake areas that usually means seasonal and vacation homes; elsewhere it can point to weak demand.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Turah
| Period | Turah | Montana | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1977 | 1974 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1981 | 1977 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1985 | 1978 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1981 | 1982 | 1980 |
| Change | +4 | +7 | +6 |
The typical home in Turah was built around 1981, about the same vintage as the country's housing overall (1980).
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Turah
| Period | Turah | Montana | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $648 | $703 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $798 | $775 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $668 | $870 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $924 | $1,189 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$276 | +$487 | +$606 |
Rent in Turah runs $924 a month at the median, utilities included, well below the U.S. median of $1,571. The typical renter here spends 22.0% of household income on rent, comfortably under the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, and a smaller share than renters pay nationally.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Turah
Bachelor's degrees in Turah
| Period | Turah | Montana | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 27.7% | 28.7% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 27.7% | 29.8% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 31.9% | 32.2% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 26.7% | 35.3% | 35.6% |
| Change | −1.0 pts | +6.6 pts | +7.2 pts |
Just over a quarter of adults 25 and older in Turah (26.7%) have a bachelor's degree or higher, below the national share of 35.6%.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Turah
| Period | Turah | Montana | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 91.4% | 91.2% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 93.2% | 92.6% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 91.7% | 93.6% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 93.3% | 94.6% | 89.3% |
| Change | +1.8 pts | +3.4 pts | +4.3 pts |
High school completion in Turah is above the national rate: 93.3% of adults have a diploma, against 89.3%. The picture is much the same across Montana.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Turah
| Period | Turah | Montana | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 5.4% | 5.7% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 8.8% | 6.9% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 2.8% | 4.2% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 4.8% | 3.7% | 5.4% |
| Change | −0.6 pts | −2.0 pts | −2.7 pts |
Unemployment in Turah is close to the national rate: 4.8% of the labor force, against 5.4%. The rate is higher than in Montana as a whole (3.7%). Each figure pools five years of surveys (2020–24), so it describes that whole stretch rather than today's job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Turah compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turah | 2.43 | 49.7 | 8.7% | 19.3% | 17.5% | 1981 | $924 | 26.7% | 93.3% | 4.8% |
| Clinton | 2.63 | 42.3 | 9.2% | 15.4% | 7.4% | 1987 | $1,609 | 37.8% | 94.9% | 5.5% |
| Ravenna | 2.42 | 49.7 | 8.7% | 20.8% | 19.7% | 1978 | $863 | 26.5% | 93.0% | 3.0% |
| Bonner | 2.41 | 48.8 | 9.3% | 12.1% | 14.8% | 1984 | $1,170 | 40.2% | 96.5% | 4.6% |
| Potomac | 2.30 | 55.5 | 5.1% | 7.9% | 31.6% | 1990 | $805 | 39.2% | 99.3% | 1.4% |
| Florence | 2.67 | 50.3 | 4.5% | 10.1% | 6.2% | 1992 | $1,270 | 33.7% | 95.4% | 5.6% |
| Milltown | 2.32 | 49.4 | 11.4% | 14.9% | 7.8% | 1988 | $1,203 | 35.2% | 94.6% | 1.5% |
| Twin Creeks | 2.40 | 50.3 | 9.5% | 10.0% | 11.3% | 1983 | $1,169 | 48.6% | 96.7% | 3.9% |
| Lolo | 2.53 | 37.9 | 7.0% | 22.0% | 5.2% | 1994 | $1,178 | 40.8% | 96.5% | 0.8% |
| Stevensville | 2.71 | 45.8 | 6.6% | 16.0% | 12.9% | 1993 | $1,202 | 29.5% | 94.6% | 2.9% |
| Missoula | 2.27 | 36.4 | 9.3% | 46.8% | 7.0% | 1983 | $1,350 | 49.4% | 96.5% | 3.8% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Plaza, ND · Olivesburg, OH · Oma, MS · Opihikao, HI · Orick, CA · Oso, WA · Otsego Lake, MI · Oval, PA · Pipers Gap, VA · Plato, IN
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Turah. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.