Village 9, Sacramento, CA Demographics

Population 5,368 · Census ACS 2020–24

Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.

Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Village 9, Sacramento, CA map of median age by neighborhood
Click the map to explore
Younger residents Older residents
Colorblind friendly off

More maps of Village 9: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet

Jump to median age ↓︎

Population and households in Village 9

Household size in Village 9

Household size, people per household
PeriodVillage 9Sacramento areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–102.462.763.042.68
2010–142.672.813.102.73
2015–192.662.823.092.71
2020–242.472.833.012.65
Change+0.01+0.07−0.03−0.03
Show on the map ↑︎

The average household in Village 9 has 2.47 people, under the U.S. average of 2.65. The biggest households, usually families with children, are concentrated in the southeast.

Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).

Median age in Village 9

Median age, years
PeriodVillage 9Sacramento areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–1042.536.735.837.7
2010–1441.237.636.838.6
2015–1947.738.737.939.6
2020–2449.739.639.040.1
Change+7.2+2.9+3.1+2.3
Show on the map ↑︎

Village 9 skews older: half of its residents are older than 49.7, well above the national median of 40.1. That usually means more empty nesters and retirees, and fewer young families. Since 2006–10, the median age has climbed from 42.5, a much bigger shift than nationally. Only one other Sacramento neighborhood is older.

Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).

Single-parent households in Village 9

Single-parent households, % of households
PeriodVillage 9Sacramento areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–109.8%12.8%13.5%12.3%
2010–1412.9%12.9%13.5%12.3%
2015–199.8%11.5%12.3%11.6%
2020–2412.0%11.0%12.3%11.6%
Change+2.1 pts−1.7 pts−1.2 pts−0.6 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Single-parent households are about as common in Village 9 as they are nationally: 12.0%, against 11.6%. Since 2006–10, the single-parent share has risen 2.1 points, even as the national share fell.

Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).

Housing in Village 9

Renters in Village 9

Renters, % of occupied homes
PeriodVillage 9Sacramento areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–1035.6%37.3%42.6%33.3%
2010–1452.5%40.4%45.2%35.6%
2015–1939.0%39.7%45.2%36.0%
2020–2438.5%37.0%44.1%34.8%
Change+2.9 pts−0.3 pts+1.5 pts+1.5 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Renting is a bit more common in Village 9 than nationally: 38.5% of households rent their homes, against 34.8% for the U.S. Among homeowners, 21.8% have no mortgage at all, well below the national share of 39.8%. Rentals cluster in the north; owners are most common in the southeast. The renter share is up 2.9 points from 2006–10, mirroring the country.

Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).

Vacant homes in Village 9

Vacant homes, % of all homes
PeriodVillage 9Sacramento areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–1011.7%9.3%8.7%11.4%
2010–143.7%8.7%8.1%11.4%
2015–196.5%6.7%7.5%11.1%
2020–2410.2%6.7%7.3%9.6%
Change−1.5 pts−2.6 pts−1.4 pts−1.8 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Vacancy in Village 9 is close to the national rate: 10.2% of homes are empty, against 9.6%. The rate is higher than in the Sacramento area as a whole (6.7%). Vacancy is down 1.5 points from 2006–10, in line with the national trend.

Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).

Age of homes in Village 9

Age of homes, median year built
PeriodVillage 9Sacramento areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–102002198019721974
2010–142005198119731975
2015–192005198219741977
2020–242005198519761980
Change+3+5+4+6
Show on the map ↑︎

Much of the housing in Village 9 is relatively new: half of its homes were built after 2005, compared with 1980 for the U.S. as a whole. The median year built has moved up from 2002 in 2006–10, a sign of steady new building. Village 9 has newer homes than at least four in five Sacramento neighborhoods.

Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).

Rent in Village 9

Rent, per month
PeriodVillage 9Sacramento areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–10$1,483$1,199$1,298$965
2010–14$1,411$1,254$1,379$1,040
2015–19$1,881$1,488$1,721$1,213
2020–24$2,142$2,018$2,229$1,571
Change+$658+$818+$931+$606
Show on the map ↑︎

The median renter in Village 9 pays $2,142 a month for rent and utilities, well above the national median of $1,571. Rents are up $658 a month from 2006–10, a 44% rise, a slower climb than the nation's. The typical renter here spends 45.7% of household income on rent, well over the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, so many renters here are stretched. Renters on a budget will find the lowest rents in the north; the highest are in the southwest.

Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).

Education in Village 9

Bachelor's degrees in Village 9

Bachelor's degrees, % of adults 25+
PeriodVillage 9Sacramento areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–1040.7%30.1%29.1%28.4%
2010–1438.6%30.6%30.1%29.6%
2015–1953.0%33.6%32.9%32.1%
2020–2442.8%37.4%36.3%35.6%
Change+2.2 pts+7.2 pts+7.1 pts+7.2 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

More than four in ten adults 25 and older in Village 9 (42.8%) have a bachelor's degree or higher, above the national share of 35.6%. The share with a degree is up 2.2 points from 2006–10, a smaller shift than nationally. College graduates are most concentrated in the southwest and least in the north.

Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).

High school graduates in Village 9

High school graduates, % of adults 25+
PeriodVillage 9Sacramento areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–1092.8%86.8%79.9%84.9%
2010–1496.8%87.6%80.7%86.1%
2015–1996.8%89.0%82.6%87.7%
2020–2493.7%89.9%84.2%89.3%
Change+0.9 pts+3.1 pts+4.3 pts+4.3 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

High school completion in Village 9 is above the national rate: 93.7% of adults have a diploma or equivalent, against 89.3%. The share with a diploma has edged up 0.9 points since 2006–10, a smaller shift than nationally.

High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).

Jobs in Village 9

Unemployment, % of the labor force
PeriodVillage 9Sacramento areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–106.6%9.7%9.2%8.1%
2010–1410.5%12.4%11.3%9.4%
2015–196.5%6.1%6.3%5.6%
2020–245.4%6.2%6.6%5.4%
Change−1.2 pts−3.5 pts−2.6 pts−2.7 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Unemployment in Village 9 is the same as the national rate: 5.4% of the labor force. The rate is lower than in the Sacramento area overall (6.2%). Each figure pools five years of surveys (2020–24), so it describes that whole stretch rather than today's job market.

Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).

Village 9 compared with nearby neighborhoods

NeighborhoodHousehold sizeMedian ageSingle parentsRentersVacant homesMedian year builtMedian rentBachelor's degreeHigh school diplomaUnemployment
Village 92.4749.712.0%38.5%10.2%2005$2,14242.8%93.7%5.4%
Village 112.7535.33.7%41.9%10.1%2004$1,89856.3%93.8%0.8%
Natomas Park3.0438.911.0%27.4%6.6%2003$1,95549.3%95.7%4.0%
Village 123.0237.012.0%38.0%4.9%2004$1,90658.2%98.6%3.0%
Natomas Creek3.1037.29.7%17.0%2.1%2007$2,60849.1%91.8%5.8%
Creekside2.7534.413.9%43.9%5.4%2006$2,30941.9%91.3%7.3%
Village 52.9631.924.8%69.7%10.0%2011$1,38955.1%94.7%7.5%
Village 22.5541.25.4%30.9%7.0%2008$1,53949.1%91.9%3.1%
Natomas Crossing2.8436.53.4%53.1%10.1%2012$1,65157.5%93.4%1.8%
Gateway West3.2537.18.9%32.5%6.7%2001$2,03136.1%89.8%4.2%
Glenwood Meadows3.8230.224.0%47.8%2.4%1985$2,05810.1%78.7%3.8%

All figures 2020–24.

Neighborhoods with similar populations: Amber Valley, Fargo, ND · Arcadia, Kalamazoo, MI · Archer Limits, Chicago, IL · Auburn Park, Chicago, IL · Barrio Amelia, Guaynabo, PR · Town Center, Oxnard, CA · Belle Haven, Belle View, VA · Brandywine Village, Wilmington, DE · Central East Austin, Austin, TX · Upper Falls, Rochester, NY

About these numbers

Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Village 9. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.

No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.