Natomas Park, Sacramento, CA Demographics

Population 9,245 · Census ACS 2020–24

Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.

Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Natomas Park, Sacramento, CA map of median age by neighborhood
Click the map to explore
Younger residents Older residents
Colorblind friendly off

More maps of Natomas Park: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet

Jump to median age ↓︎

Population and households in Natomas Park

Household size in Natomas Park

Household size, people per household
PeriodNatomas ParkSacramento areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–103.142.763.042.68
2010–143.262.813.102.73
2015–193.272.823.092.71
2020–243.042.833.012.65
Change−0.10+0.07−0.03−0.03
Show on the map ↑︎

Natomas Park is a place of big households: 3.04 people per home on average, compared with 2.65 nationally. Numbers like that usually point to plenty of families with kids. Household size has dropped from 3.14 in 2006–10, a much bigger shift than nationally.

Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).

Median age in Natomas Park

Median age, years
PeriodNatomas ParkSacramento areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–1031.936.735.837.7
2010–1434.937.636.838.6
2015–1939.638.737.939.6
2020–2438.939.639.040.1
Change+7.0+2.9+3.1+2.3
Show on the map ↑︎

At 38.9, the median age in Natomas Park is close to the national median of 40.1, so its age mix looks much like the country's. The median age has climbed from 31.9 in 2006–10, a much bigger shift than nationally. The youngest areas are in the center, the oldest in the southeast.

Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).

Single-parent households in Natomas Park

Single-parent households, % of households
PeriodNatomas ParkSacramento areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–1011.9%12.8%13.5%12.3%
2010–149.7%12.9%13.5%12.3%
2015–198.9%11.5%12.3%11.6%
2020–2411.0%11.0%12.3%11.6%
Change−0.8 pts−1.7 pts−1.2 pts−0.6 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Single parents head just over one in ten households in Natomas Park (11.0%), close to the national share of 11.6%. The single-parent share has edged down 0.8 points since 2006–10, mirroring the country.

Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).

Housing in Natomas Park

Renters in Natomas Park

Renters, % of occupied homes
PeriodNatomas ParkSacramento areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–1039.3%37.3%42.6%33.3%
2010–1441.8%40.4%45.2%35.6%
2015–1933.2%39.7%45.2%36.0%
2020–2427.4%37.0%44.1%34.8%
Change−11.9 pts−0.3 pts+1.5 pts+1.5 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Most households in Natomas Park own their homes; 27.4% rent, below the national share of 34.8%. Among homeowners, 15.9% have no mortgage at all, well below the national share of 39.8%. Since 2006–10, the renter share has fallen 11.9 points, even as the national share rose. Of Sacramento's 61 neighborhoods, only two have a lower share of renters.

Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).

Vacant homes in Natomas Park

Vacant homes, % of all homes
PeriodNatomas ParkSacramento areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–107.0%9.3%8.7%11.4%
2010–149.8%8.7%8.1%11.4%
2015–192.9%6.7%7.5%11.1%
2020–246.6%6.7%7.3%9.6%
Change−0.4 pts−2.6 pts−1.4 pts−1.8 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Fewer homes sit empty in Natomas Park than nationally: 6.6%, against 9.6% for the U.S. That is in line with the rest of the Sacramento area.

Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).

Age of homes in Natomas Park

Age of homes, median year built
PeriodNatomas ParkSacramento areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–101994198019721974
2010–142004198119731975
2015–192004198219741977
2020–242003198519761980
Change+10+5+4+6
Show on the map ↑︎

Much of the housing in Natomas Park is relatively new: half of its homes were built after 2003, compared with 1980 for the U.S. as a whole. The median year built has moved up from 1994 in 2006–10, a sign of steady new building. Natomas Park has newer homes than the great majority of Sacramento neighborhoods.

Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).

Rent in Natomas Park

Rent, per month
PeriodNatomas ParkSacramento areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–10$1,433$1,199$1,298$965
2010–14$1,251$1,254$1,379$1,040
2015–19$1,911$1,488$1,721$1,213
2020–24$1,955$2,018$2,229$1,571
Change+$521+$818+$931+$606
Show on the map ↑︎

Rent in Natomas Park runs $1,955 a month at the median, utilities included, well above the U.S. median of $1,571. Rents are up $521 a month from 2006–10, a 36% rise, a slower climb than the nation's. Rent takes 33.1% of the typical renter's income, well over the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, so many renters here are stretched. Rents run highest in the west and lowest in the north.

Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).

Education in Natomas Park

Bachelor's degrees in Natomas Park

Bachelor's degrees, % of adults 25+
PeriodNatomas ParkSacramento areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–1052.1%30.1%29.1%28.4%
2010–1447.9%30.6%30.1%29.6%
2015–1947.2%33.6%32.9%32.1%
2020–2449.3%37.4%36.3%35.6%
Change−2.8 pts+7.2 pts+7.1 pts+7.2 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

College graduates are unusually common in Natomas Park: 49.3% of adults 25 and older have a bachelor's degree or higher, against 35.6% nationally. Education tends to track local incomes and the kinds of jobs nearby. The share with a degree has fallen 2.8 points since 2006–10, even as the national share rose.

Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).

High school graduates in Natomas Park

High school graduates, % of adults 25+
PeriodNatomas ParkSacramento areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–1094.8%86.8%79.9%84.9%
2010–1492.3%87.6%80.7%86.1%
2015–1993.0%89.0%82.6%87.7%
2020–2495.7%89.9%84.2%89.3%
Change+0.9 pts+3.1 pts+4.3 pts+4.3 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

High school completion is high in Natomas Park: 95.7% of adults 25 and older have a diploma or equivalent, well above the national rate of 89.3%. Since 2006–10, the share with a diploma has edged up 0.9 points, a smaller shift than nationally. Natomas Park has a higher share of high school graduates than at least four in five Sacramento neighborhoods.

High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).

Jobs in Natomas Park

Unemployment, % of the labor force
PeriodNatomas ParkSacramento areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–108.2%9.7%9.2%8.1%
2010–148.2%12.4%11.3%9.4%
2015–192.3%6.1%6.3%5.6%
2020–244.0%6.2%6.6%5.4%
Change−4.2 pts−3.5 pts−2.6 pts−2.7 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Unemployment in Natomas Park runs below the national rate: 4.0% of the labor force was out of work and looking, against 5.4% nationally. Unemployment is down 4.2 points from 2006–10, as it has nationally. Because the Census pools five years of responses (2020–24), these rates smooth over short swings and lag the current job market.

Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).

Natomas Park compared with nearby neighborhoods

NeighborhoodHousehold sizeMedian ageSingle parentsRentersVacant homesMedian year builtMedian rentBachelor's degreeHigh school diplomaUnemployment
Natomas Park3.0438.911.0%27.4%6.6%2003$1,95549.3%95.7%4.0%
Village 123.0237.012.0%38.0%4.9%2004$1,90658.2%98.6%3.0%
Village 52.9631.924.8%69.7%10.0%2011$1,38955.1%94.7%7.5%
Village 92.4749.712.0%38.5%10.2%2005$2,14242.8%93.7%5.4%
Village 112.7535.33.7%41.9%10.1%2004$1,89856.3%93.8%0.8%
Creekside2.7534.413.9%43.9%5.4%2006$2,30941.9%91.3%7.3%
Natomas Creek3.1037.29.7%17.0%2.1%2007$2,60849.1%91.8%5.8%
Natomas Crossing2.8436.53.4%53.1%10.1%2012$1,65157.5%93.4%1.8%
Village 22.5541.25.4%30.9%7.0%2008$1,53949.1%91.9%3.1%
Gateway West3.2537.18.9%32.5%6.7%2001$2,03136.1%89.8%4.2%
Glenwood Meadows3.8230.224.0%47.8%2.4%1985$2,05810.1%78.7%3.8%

All figures 2020–24.

Neighborhoods with similar populations: Baylor, Waco, TX · West Highland, Denver, CO · Walker's Point, Milwaukee, WI · Victoria Park, Fort Lauderdale, FL · Rexland Acres, Bakersfield, CA · Newton Corner, Newton, MA · MacKenzie, Detroit, MI · Lincoln Village Proper, Stockton, CA · Laurelglen, Bakersfield, CA · International District, Seattle, WA

About these numbers

Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Natomas Park. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.

No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.