Population 418 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of White City: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in White City
Household size in White City
| Period | White City | Chattanooga area | Tennessee | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.52 | 2.48 | 2.53 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.43 | 2.53 | 2.57 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.38 | 2.50 | 2.57 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.07 | 2.50 | 2.53 | 2.65 |
| Change | −0.44 | +0.02 | +0.00 | −0.03 |
Households in White City are small: just 2.07 people on average, compared with 2.65 nationally. That is typical of places where many people live alone or as couples, and fewer have children at home. Since 2006–10, household size has dropped from 2.52, but in a place this small, survey estimates can swing a lot from one release to the next.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in White City
| Period | White City | Chattanooga area | Tennessee | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 42.9 | 39.6 | 38.3 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 41.8 | 40.5 | 39.2 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 41.6 | 41.3 | 39.9 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 37.9 | 41.2 | 39.9 | 40.1 |
| Change | −5.0 | +1.6 | +1.6 | +2.3 |
White City is a little younger than the country as a whole: its median age is 37.9, against 40.1 nationally.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in White City
| Period | White City | Chattanooga area | Tennessee | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 6.0% | 11.2% | 12.2% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 10.6% | 11.2% | 12.0% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 11.9% | 9.8% | 11.6% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 2.6% | 11.1% | 11.8% | 11.6% |
| Change | −3.3 pts | −0.1 pts | −0.4 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single parents head only 2.6% of households in White City, well below the national share of 11.6%.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in White City
Renters in White City
| Period | White City | Chattanooga area | Tennessee | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 24.5% | 30.9% | 30.4% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 29.4% | 32.2% | 32.9% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 22.2% | 32.9% | 33.7% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 14.2% | 31.8% | 33.1% | 34.8% |
| Change | −10.3 pts | +1.0 pts | +2.6 pts | +1.5 pts |
White City is overwhelmingly a place of homeowners: only 14.2% of households rent, far below the national share of 34.8%. Owner-heavy areas like this tend to see less turnover. About four in ten owners (39.6%) have paid off their mortgages, about the same as nationally.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in White City
| Period | White City | Chattanooga area | Tennessee | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 11.3% | 11.3% | 11.5% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 9.2% | 11.8% | 11.8% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 23.3% | 11.6% | 11.8% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 19.4% | 9.9% | 10.1% | 9.6% |
| Change | +8.1 pts | −1.4 pts | −1.4 pts | −1.8 pts |
Vacant homes make up 19.4% of the housing in White City, far above the national rate of 9.6%. In resort and lake areas that usually means seasonal and vacation homes; elsewhere it can point to weak demand.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in White City
| Period | White City | Chattanooga area | Tennessee | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1985 | 1977 | 1981 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1983 | 1978 | 1982 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1988 | 1980 | 1983 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1987 | 1983 | 1986 | 1980 |
| Change | +2 | +6 | +6 | +6 |
Homes in White City are newer than the national norm: the median home was built in 1987, versus 1980 across the U.S.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in White City
| Period | White City | Chattanooga area | Tennessee | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $550 | $731 | $761 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $425 | $803 | $837 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $716 | $876 | $961 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $645 | $1,184 | $1,286 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$95 | +$454 | +$526 | +$606 |
The median renter in White City pays $645 a month for rent and utilities, well below the national median of $1,571. The typical renter here spends 31.5% of household income on rent, just over the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in White City
Bachelor's degrees in White City
| Period | White City | Chattanooga area | Tennessee | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 7.8% | 22.9% | 23.9% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 7.3% | 24.3% | 25.3% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 6.7% | 27.2% | 27.9% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 9.2% | 31.6% | 31.4% | 35.6% |
| Change | +1.4 pts | +8.7 pts | +7.5 pts | +7.2 pts |
Fewer adults in White City have a four-year degree than in the country as a whole: 9.2%, against 35.6% nationally.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in White City
| Period | White City | Chattanooga area | Tennessee | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 70.0% | 82.5% | 83.3% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 74.4% | 84.9% | 85.4% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 72.4% | 87.4% | 87.6% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 91.6% | 89.5% | 89.9% | 89.3% |
| Change | +21.5 pts | +7.0 pts | +6.6 pts | +4.3 pts |
High school completion in White City is a bit above the national rate: 91.6% of adults have a diploma or equivalent, against 89.3%.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in White City
| Period | White City | Chattanooga area | Tennessee | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 8.2% | 9.1% | 8.6% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 12.6% | 9.3% | 9.6% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 2.5% | 4.9% | 5.4% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 2.2% | 4.7% | 4.8% | 5.4% |
| Change | −6.0 pts | −4.4 pts | −3.8 pts | −2.7 pts |
Unemployment in White City has been low: just 2.2% of the labor force was out of work and looking, well below the national rate of 5.4%. Each figure pools five years of surveys (2020–24), so it describes that whole stretch rather than today's job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
White City compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White City | 2.07 | 37.9 | 2.6% | 14.2% | 19.4% | 1987 | $645 | 9.2% | 91.6% | 2.2% |
| Tracy City | 2.76 | 34.6 | 11.1% | 33.2% | 22.2% | 1985 | $558 | 13.2% | 74.8% | 4.9% |
| Mount View | 2.41 | 40.4 | 17.9% | 24.1% | 21.8% | 1991 | $998 | 21.8% | 84.7% | 8.7% |
| Monteagle | 2.46 | 42.4 | 17.9% | 25.2% | 20.1% | 1988 | $925 | 22.4% | 85.3% | 11.3% |
| Coalmont | 2.67 | 40.8 | 8.7% | 14.1% | 7.3% | 1993 | $736 | 20.0% | 85.7% | 11.2% |
| Sweeton Hill | 2.87 | 39.5 | 9.9% | 18.2% | 16.8% | 1985 | $707 | 18.2% | 77.0% | 8.2% |
| Sequatchie | 2.50 | 34.3 | 5.7% | 15.3% | 13.8% | 1991 | $760 | 15.0% | 91.0% | 4.2% |
| Dogtown | 2.60 | 37.9 | 11.2% | 10.9% | 14.5% | 1989 | $498 | 8.0% | 83.7% | 6.1% |
| Griffith Creek | 2.65 | 43.5 | 19.1% | 17.4% | 8.2% | 1990 | $954 | 11.9% | 73.7% | 3.1% |
| Gruetli-Laager | 2.67 | 42.3 | 8.9% | 8.9% | 16.5% | 1986 | $494 | 9.5% | 85.8% | 6.2% |
| Martin Springs | 2.81 | 35.2 | 16.3% | 18.5% | 13.4% | 1993 | $1,245 | 21.5% | 87.4% | 12.2% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: St. Onge, SD · Farner, TN · Finley, ND · Forksville, VA · Francktown, NC · Skippers, VA · Slatedale, PA · Soldier Creek, SD · South Hiram, ME · South Hollis, ME
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up White City. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.