Population 33,720 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of ZIP 96001: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in ZIP 96001
Household size in ZIP 96001
| Period | ZIP 96001 | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.46 | 3.04 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.54 | 3.10 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.38 | 3.09 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.54 | 3.01 | 2.65 |
| Change | +0.08 | −0.03 | −0.03 |
The average household in ZIP 96001 has 2.54 people, a bit under the U.S. average of 2.65. Since 2006–10, household size has crept up from 2.46, even as the national average fell.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in ZIP 96001
| Period | ZIP 96001 | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 40.6 | 35.8 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 41.5 | 36.8 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 42.4 | 37.9 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 42.9 | 39.0 | 40.1 |
| Change | +2.4 | +3.1 | +2.3 |
The median resident of ZIP 96001 is 42.9 years old, older than the national median of 40.1. Since 2006–10, the median age has climbed from 40.6, in line with the national trend. The youngest areas are in the north, the oldest in the west.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in ZIP 96001
| Period | ZIP 96001 | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 12.6% | 13.5% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 11.0% | 13.5% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 11.9% | 12.3% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 13.0% | 12.3% | 11.6% |
| Change | +0.4 pts | −1.2 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single-parent households are a bit more common in ZIP 96001 than nationally: 13.0%, against 11.6%. The picture is much the same across California.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in ZIP 96001
Renters in ZIP 96001
| Period | ZIP 96001 | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 37.8% | 42.6% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 40.8% | 45.2% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 42.1% | 45.2% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 39.2% | 44.1% | 34.8% |
| Change | +1.4 pts | +1.5 pts | +1.5 pts |
Renting is a bit more common in ZIP 96001 than nationally: 39.2% of households rent their homes, against 34.8% for the U.S. Even so, renters make up a smaller share here than in California overall (44.1%). Among homeowners, 33.2% have no mortgage at all, below the national share of 39.8%. The renter share is up 1.4 points from 2006–10, mirroring the country.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in ZIP 96001
| Period | ZIP 96001 | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 9.3% | 8.7% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 9.5% | 8.1% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 8.2% | 7.5% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 9.7% | 7.3% | 9.6% |
| Change | +0.4 pts | −1.4 pts | −1.8 pts |
Vacancy in ZIP 96001 is close to the national rate: 9.7% of homes are empty, against 9.6%. The rate is higher than in California overall (7.3%).
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in ZIP 96001
| Period | ZIP 96001 | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1975 | 1972 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1975 | 1973 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1974 | 1974 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1977 | 1976 | 1980 |
| Change | +2 | +4 | +6 |
The typical home in ZIP 96001 was built around 1977, about the same vintage as the country's housing overall (1980). The newest homes are mostly in the west, the oldest in the east.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in ZIP 96001
| Period | ZIP 96001 | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $1,021 | $1,298 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $1,171 | $1,379 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $1,256 | $1,721 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $1,697 | $2,229 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$676 | +$931 | +$606 |
Rent in ZIP 96001 runs $1,697 a month at the median, utilities included, above the U.S. median of $1,571. Still, rents here are lower than in California as a whole ($2,229). Rents are up $676 a month from 2006–10, a 66% jump, faster than rents rose nationally. Rent takes 33.1% of the typical renter's income, well over the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, so many renters here are stretched.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in ZIP 96001
Bachelor's degrees in ZIP 96001
| Period | ZIP 96001 | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 24.0% | 29.1% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 26.0% | 30.1% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 27.3% | 32.9% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 28.8% | 36.3% | 35.6% |
| Change | +4.8 pts | +7.1 pts | +7.2 pts |
Nearly three in ten adults 25 and older in ZIP 96001 (28.8%) have a bachelor's degree or higher, below the national share of 35.6%. The share with a degree is up 4.8 points from 2006–10, in line with the national trend. College graduates are most concentrated in the west and least in the center.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in ZIP 96001
| Period | ZIP 96001 | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 88.6% | 79.9% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 90.9% | 80.7% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 92.1% | 82.6% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 93.3% | 84.2% | 89.3% |
| Change | +4.7 pts | +4.3 pts | +4.3 pts |
High school completion in ZIP 96001 is above the national rate: 93.3% of adults have a diploma, against 89.3%. The share with a diploma is up 4.7 points from 2006–10, as it has nationally.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in ZIP 96001
| Period | ZIP 96001 | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 11.3% | 9.2% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 11.9% | 11.3% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 5.8% | 6.3% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 7.7% | 6.6% | 5.4% |
| Change | −3.7 pts | −2.6 pts | −2.7 pts |
Unemployment in ZIP 96001 runs well above the national rate: 7.7% of the labor force was out of work and looking, against 5.4%. Unemployment has fallen 3.7 points since 2006–10, as it has nationally. Each figure pools five years of surveys (2020–24), so it describes that whole stretch rather than today's job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
ZIP 96001 compared with nearby ZIP codes
| ZIP code | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZIP 96001 | 2.54 | 42.9 | 13.0% | 39.2% | 9.7% | 1977 | $1,697 | 28.8% | 93.3% | 7.7% |
| ZIP 96002 | 2.61 | 40.3 | 12.6% | 40.6% | 8.5% | 1980 | $1,530 | 23.1% | 92.9% | 4.5% |
| ZIP 96003 | 2.51 | 41.2 | 10.1% | 40.9% | 10.7% | 1987 | $1,648 | 27.8% | 93.9% | 5.0% |
| ZIP 96087 | 2.70 | 50.5 | 5.0% | 4.0% | 19.0% | 1980 | $1,007 | 23.3% | 96.7% | 17.4% |
| ZIP 96007 | 2.57 | 40.9 | 13.1% | 29.7% | 9.3% | 1982 | $1,048 | 14.9% | 86.5% | 7.3% |
| ZIP 96019 | 2.54 | 42.7 | 13.4% | 31.7% | 7.9% | 1981 | $1,270 | 15.4% | 90.3% | 7.8% |
| ZIP 96073 | 2.87 | 43.3 | 5.7% | 10.1% | 2.6% | 1981 | $1,570 | 38.5% | 94.0% | 5.4% |
| ZIP 96047 | 2.63 | 47.1 | 7.9% | 10.0% | 22.1% | 1988 | $1,580 | 34.0% | 93.3% | 9.7% |
| ZIP 96062 | 2.70 | 49.9 | 8.2% | 13.2% | 13.4% | 1982 | $1,657 | 23.7% | 96.2% | 4.7% |
| ZIP 96008 | 2.70 | 44.9 | 7.4% | 16.4% | 6.2% | 1985 | $1,643 | 25.7% | 91.3% | 9.7% |
| ZIP 96096 | 2.53 | 52.6 | 6.4% | 12.2% | 14.0% | 1983 | $1,599 | 25.7% | 96.1% | 4.7% |
All figures 2020–24.
Zip codes with similar populations: 06614, CT · 10010, NY · 10036, NY · 10065, NY · 19087, PA · 91107, CA · 59701, MT · 60169, IL · 60901, IL · 61008, IL
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up ZIP 96001. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.