Population 485 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of Como: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Como
Household size in Como
| Period | Como | Denver area | Colorado | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1.99 | 2.58 | 2.57 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 1.84 | 2.66 | 2.63 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.00 | 2.68 | 2.64 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 1.85 | 2.57 | 2.54 | 2.65 |
| Change | −0.14 | −0.01 | −0.04 | −0.03 |
Households in Como are small: just 1.85 people on average, compared with 2.65 nationally. That is typical of places where many people live alone or as couples, and fewer have children at home. Since 2006–10, household size has dropped from 1.99, but in a place this small, survey estimates can swing a lot from one release to the next.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Como
| Period | Como | Denver area | Colorado | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 54.0 | 36.7 | 36.9 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 55.4 | 37.3 | 37.7 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 61.0 | 38.0 | 38.5 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 53.8 | 38.5 | 39.1 | 40.1 |
| Change | −0.2 | +1.8 | +2.1 | +2.3 |
Como skews older: half of its residents are older than 53.8, well above the national median of 40.1. That usually means more empty nesters and retirees, and fewer young families.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Como
| Period | Como | Denver area | Colorado | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 4.4% | 10.8% | 10.5% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 4.8% | 11.0% | 10.8% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 2.5% | 9.8% | 9.5% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 6.9% | 9.6% | 9.3% | 11.6% |
| Change | +2.5 pts | −1.2 pts | −1.1 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single parents head only 6.9% of households in Como, well below the national share of 11.6%.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Como
Renters in Como
| Period | Como | Denver area | Colorado | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 19.3% | 33.5% | 32.4% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 7.7% | 36.4% | 35.2% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 8.0% | 36.1% | 34.8% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 3.4% | 35.9% | 33.8% | 34.8% |
| Change | −15.9 pts | +2.4 pts | +1.4 pts | +1.5 pts |
Como is overwhelmingly a place of homeowners: only 3.4% of households rent, far below the national share of 34.8%. Owner-heavy areas like this tend to see less turnover. Among homeowners, 31.4% have no mortgage at all, below the national share of 39.8%.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Como
| Period | Como | Denver area | Colorado | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 74.4% | 8.5% | 10.3% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 79.3% | 6.6% | 8.7% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 83.0% | 5.5% | 8.0% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 70.5% | 6.0% | 7.3% | 9.6% |
| Change | −3.9 pts | −2.5 pts | −3.0 pts | −1.8 pts |
Vacancy is high in Como: 70.5% of homes are empty, far above the national rate of 9.6%. In resort and lake areas that usually means seasonal and vacation homes; elsewhere it can point to weak demand.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Como
| Period | Como | Denver area | Colorado | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1983 | 1980 | 1981 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1994 | 1981 | 1982 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1995 | 1982 | 1983 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1993 | 1987 | 1988 | 1980 |
| Change | +10 | +8 | +7 | +6 |
Como has newer housing than the country as a whole: the median home was built in 1993, versus 1980 nationally.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Como
| Period | Como | Denver area | Colorado | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $982 | $1,128 | $1,051 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $1,101 | $1,245 | $1,165 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $1,129 | $1,606 | $1,450 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $2,161 | $2,181 | $1,963 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$1,179 | +$1,053 | +$912 | +$606 |
A typical rental in Como costs $2,161 a month with utilities, well above the national median of $1,571. That is in line with the rest of the Denver area. The typical renter here spends 28.1% of household income on rent, just under the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, and a smaller share than renters pay nationally.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Como
Bachelor's degrees in Como
| Period | Como | Denver area | Colorado | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 44.9% | 38.1% | 36.4% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 33.5% | 40.0% | 37.8% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 23.3% | 43.5% | 40.9% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 43.1% | 49.1% | 45.9% | 35.6% |
| Change | −1.8 pts | +11.0 pts | +9.4 pts | +7.2 pts |
More than four in ten adults 25 and older in Como (43.1%) have a bachelor's degree or higher, above the national share of 35.6%. Locally, though, the share is lower than in the wider Denver area (49.1%).
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Como
| Period | Como | Denver area | Colorado | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 94.1% | 88.8% | 89.5% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 95.8% | 89.8% | 90.5% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 96.8% | 91.1% | 91.8% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 100.0% | 92.1% | 92.8% | 89.3% |
| Change | +5.9 pts | +3.3 pts | +3.3 pts | +4.3 pts |
Finishing high school is nearly universal in Como: 100.0% of adults 25 and older have a diploma or equivalent, well above the national rate of 89.3%.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Como
| Period | Como | Denver area | Colorado | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 4.2% | 6.8% | 6.8% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 8.7% | 7.5% | 7.9% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 3.9% | 3.7% | 4.4% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 2.1% | 4.4% | 4.6% | 5.4% |
| Change | −2.1 pts | −2.4 pts | −2.3 pts | −2.7 pts |
Unemployment in Como has been low: just 2.1% of the labor force was out of work and looking, well below the national rate of 5.4%. Because the Census pools five years of responses (2020–24), these rates smooth over short swings and lag the current job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Como compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Como | 1.85 | 53.8 | 6.9% | 3.4% | 70.5% | 1993 | $2,161 | 43.1% | 100.0% | 2.1% |
| Jefferson | 1.85 | 53.8 | 6.9% | 3.4% | 70.4% | 1993 | $2,161 | 43.1% | 100.0% | 2.1% |
| Glentivar | 2.28 | 44.6 | 8.6% | 14.2% | 51.4% | 2001 | $2,178 | 48.9% | 99.2% | 1.0% |
| Fairplay | 2.15 | 43.4 | 9.1% | 26.9% | 42.9% | 1998 | $2,193 | 49.4% | 98.5% | 2.1% |
| Tarryall | 1.90 | 56.9 | 7.5% | 6.7% | 64.3% | 1987 | $2,159 | 43.4% | 98.7% | 1.3% |
| Alma | 1.80 | 44.2 | 6.8% | 40.0% | 31.0% | 1991 | $2,220 | 51.1% | 97.4% | 5.1% |
| Grant | 2.07 | 53.1 | 4.8% | 3.5% | 42.6% | 1994 | $2,340 | 37.2% | 98.7% | 2.0% |
| Hartsel | 1.93 | 56.4 | 5.0% | 0.8% | 52.6% | 1997 | $2,151 | 39.3% | 99.1% | 0.6% |
| Shawnee | 2.26 | 53.3 | 3.1% | 3.0% | 25.0% | 1997 | $2,379 | 34.7% | 97.7% | 2.5% |
| Blue River | 2.91 | 35.9 | 2.8% | 26.5% | 58.7% | 1988 | $2,794 | 49.8% | 95.6% | 2.4% |
| Glenisle | 2.18 | 51.5 | 2.3% | 5.0% | 26.5% | 1993 | $2,176 | 36.4% | 97.0% | 3.9% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Woolworth, TN · Poe, IN · Briar Creek, PA · Bobo, OH · Burkettsville, OH · Rosedale, NJ · Belcher, KY · Beaman, MO · Bancroft, ID · Worden, KS
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Como. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.