Population 194 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of Grant: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Grant
Household size in Grant
| Period | Grant | Denver area | Colorado | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.25 | 2.58 | 2.57 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.19 | 2.66 | 2.63 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.23 | 2.68 | 2.64 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.07 | 2.57 | 2.54 | 2.65 |
| Change | −0.18 | −0.01 | −0.04 | −0.03 |
Households in Grant are small: just 2.07 people on average, compared with 2.65 nationally. That is typical of places where many people live alone or as couples, and fewer have children at home. Since 2006–10, household size has dropped from 2.25, but in a place this small, survey estimates can swing a lot from one release to the next.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Grant
| Period | Grant | Denver area | Colorado | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 46.2 | 36.7 | 36.9 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 50.4 | 37.3 | 37.7 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 53.9 | 38.0 | 38.5 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 53.1 | 38.5 | 39.1 | 40.1 |
| Change | +6.9 | +1.8 | +2.1 | +2.3 |
Grant skews older: half of its residents are older than 53.1, well above the national median of 40.1. That usually means more empty nesters and retirees, and fewer young families.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Grant
| Period | Grant | Denver area | Colorado | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 3.8% | 10.8% | 10.5% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 7.3% | 11.0% | 10.8% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 3.9% | 9.8% | 9.5% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 4.8% | 9.6% | 9.3% | 11.6% |
| Change | +0.9 pts | −1.2 pts | −1.1 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single-parent households are relatively rare in Grant: 4.8% of households, against 11.6% nationally.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Grant
Renters in Grant
| Period | Grant | Denver area | Colorado | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 10.8% | 33.5% | 32.4% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 14.6% | 36.4% | 35.2% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 13.4% | 36.1% | 34.8% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 3.5% | 35.9% | 33.8% | 34.8% |
| Change | −7.3 pts | +2.4 pts | +1.4 pts | +1.5 pts |
Only 3.5% of households in Grant rent their homes, far below the national share of 34.8%, so most residents are owners who tend to stay put. Just over a third of owners (35.1%) have paid off their mortgages, below the national share of 39.8%.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Grant
| Period | Grant | Denver area | Colorado | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 46.3% | 8.5% | 10.3% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 44.8% | 6.6% | 8.7% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 53.8% | 5.5% | 8.0% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 42.6% | 6.0% | 7.3% | 9.6% |
| Change | −3.7 pts | −2.5 pts | −3.0 pts | −1.8 pts |
Vacant homes make up 42.6% of the housing in Grant, far above the national rate of 9.6%. In resort and lake areas that usually means seasonal and vacation homes; elsewhere it can point to weak demand.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Grant
| Period | Grant | Denver area | Colorado | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1977 | 1980 | 1981 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1985 | 1981 | 1982 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1990 | 1982 | 1983 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1994 | 1987 | 1988 | 1980 |
| Change | +17 | +8 | +7 | +6 |
Much of the housing in Grant is relatively new: half of its homes were built after 1994, compared with 1980 for the U.S. as a whole.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Grant
| Period | Grant | Denver area | Colorado | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $817 | $1,128 | $1,051 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $854 | $1,245 | $1,165 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $1,007 | $1,606 | $1,450 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $2,340 | $2,181 | $1,963 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$1,523 | +$1,053 | +$912 | +$606 |
The median renter in Grant pays $2,340 a month for rent and utilities, well above the national median of $1,571. The typical renter here spends 27.7% of household income on rent, just under the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, and a smaller share than renters pay nationally.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Grant
Bachelor's degrees in Grant
| Period | Grant | Denver area | Colorado | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 35.2% | 38.1% | 36.4% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 30.8% | 40.0% | 37.8% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 31.2% | 43.5% | 40.9% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 37.2% | 49.1% | 45.9% | 35.6% |
| Change | +2.1 pts | +11.0 pts | +9.4 pts | +7.2 pts |
Nearly four in ten adults 25 and older in Grant (37.2%) hold at least a bachelor's degree, close to the national share of 35.6%. The share is lower than in the wider Denver area (49.1%).
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Grant
| Period | Grant | Denver area | Colorado | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 94.4% | 88.8% | 89.5% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 96.6% | 89.8% | 90.5% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 97.1% | 91.1% | 91.8% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 98.7% | 92.1% | 92.8% | 89.3% |
| Change | +4.3 pts | +3.3 pts | +3.3 pts | +4.3 pts |
Finishing high school is nearly universal in Grant: 98.7% of adults 25 and older have a diploma or equivalent, well above the national rate of 89.3%.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Grant
| Period | Grant | Denver area | Colorado | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 5.1% | 6.8% | 6.8% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 7.4% | 7.5% | 7.9% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 2.4% | 3.7% | 4.4% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 2.0% | 4.4% | 4.6% | 5.4% |
| Change | −3.1 pts | −2.4 pts | −2.3 pts | −2.7 pts |
Unemployment in Grant has been low: just 2.0% of the labor force was out of work and looking, well below the national rate of 5.4%. Each figure pools five years of surveys (2020–24), so it describes that whole stretch rather than today's job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Grant compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grant | 2.07 | 53.1 | 4.8% | 3.5% | 42.6% | 1994 | $2,340 | 37.2% | 98.7% | 2.0% |
| Shawnee | 2.26 | 53.3 | 3.1% | 3.0% | 25.0% | 1997 | $2,379 | 34.7% | 97.7% | 2.5% |
| Glenisle | 2.18 | 51.5 | 2.3% | 5.0% | 26.5% | 1993 | $2,176 | 36.4% | 97.0% | 3.9% |
| Jefferson | 1.85 | 53.8 | 6.9% | 3.4% | 70.4% | 1993 | $2,161 | 43.1% | 100.0% | 2.1% |
| Singleton | 1.78 | 54.6 | 3.7% | 26.1% | 16.1% | 1995 | $1,978 | 59.7% | 99.1% | 1.3% |
| Montezuma | 1.64 | 31.8 | 4.8% | 68.2% | 54.7% | 1988 | $1,052 | 51.5% | 100.0% | 2.9% |
| Bailey | 2.16 | 50.1 | 4.3% | 7.9% | 15.5% | 1990 | $2,373 | 38.5% | 97.7% | 3.8% |
| Silver Springs | 2.12 | 50.9 | 6.2% | 11.1% | 7.2% | 1989 | $2,359 | 39.3% | 97.9% | 2.7% |
| Estabrook | 2.16 | 49.8 | 3.5% | 5.3% | 10.0% | 1987 | $2,778 | 26.2% | 98.1% | 0.1% |
| Wandcrest Park | 2.39 | 46.8 | 9.3% | 3.7% | 16.2% | 1979 | $2,431 | 43.2% | 98.1% | 5.0% |
| Lawson | 1.69 | 46.3 | 2.3% | 27.3% | 32.9% | 1965 | $1,363 | 52.8% | 88.0% | 8.3% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Hardy, NE · Wyatts, NY · Coddes Beach, MI · Wrightsboro, TX · Cold Springs, CA · Columbus, ND · Colwood, MI · Counts Crossroads, KY · Crummies, KY · Crumpler, WV
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Grant. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.