Eastwood Hills, Kansas City, MO Demographics

Population 5,638 · Census ACS 2020–24

Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.

Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Eastwood Hills, Kansas City, MO map of median age by neighborhood
Click the map to explore
Younger residents Older residents
Colorblind friendly off

More maps of Eastwood Hills: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet

Jump to median age ↓︎

Population and households in Eastwood Hills

Household size in Eastwood Hills

Household size, people per household
PeriodEastwood HillsKansas City areaMissouriU.S.
2006–102.412.572.492.68
2010–142.502.602.522.73
2015–192.372.592.502.71
2020–242.662.552.492.65
Change+0.25−0.02−0.00−0.03
Show on the map ↑︎

At 2.66 people per household, Eastwood Hills sits close to the national average of 2.65. The typical household here is bigger than in the Kansas City area overall, where it has 2.55 people. Since 2006–10, household size has climbed from 2.41, even as the national average fell.

Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).

Median age in Eastwood Hills

Median age, years
PeriodEastwood HillsKansas City areaMissouriU.S.
2006–1034.637.538.437.7
2010–1435.037.939.238.6
2015–1932.638.840.039.6
2020–2433.039.240.140.1
Change−1.7+1.7+1.7+2.3
Show on the map ↑︎

Eastwood Hills is young: half of its residents are under 33.0, compared with a national median of 40.1. The population tilts toward young adults and children. Since 2006–10, the median age has dropped from 34.6, even as the national median rose.

Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).

Single-parent households in Eastwood Hills

Single-parent households, % of households
PeriodEastwood HillsKansas City areaMissouriU.S.
2006–1018.6%11.7%11.3%12.3%
2010–1416.7%11.9%11.4%12.3%
2015–1923.7%11.2%10.9%11.6%
2020–2418.4%10.9%11.0%11.6%
Change−0.3 pts−0.8 pts−0.3 pts−0.6 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Single-parent households are common in Eastwood Hills: 18.4% of all households, against 11.6% nationally. Eastwood Hills has a higher share of single-parent households than most Kansas City neighborhoods.

Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).

Housing in Eastwood Hills

Renters in Eastwood Hills

Renters, % of occupied homes
PeriodEastwood HillsKansas City areaMissouriU.S.
2006–1047.0%31.2%30.0%33.3%
2010–1454.3%33.7%32.1%35.6%
2015–1956.9%34.9%33.2%36.0%
2020–2450.2%34.2%31.9%34.8%
Change+3.1 pts+3.0 pts+1.9 pts+1.5 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Renters far outnumber owners in Eastwood Hills: 50.2% of households rent their homes, against 34.8% nationally. Among homeowners, 39.2% have no mortgage at all, about the same as nationally. Renting is most common in the south and least common in the west. The renter share is up 3.1 points from 2006–10, in line with the national trend.

Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).

Vacant homes in Eastwood Hills

Vacant homes, % of all homes
PeriodEastwood HillsKansas City areaMissouriU.S.
2006–1014.5%10.0%11.6%11.4%
2010–149.1%9.7%12.0%11.4%
2015–1912.8%9.0%12.2%11.1%
2020–248.6%7.5%10.5%9.6%
Change−5.9 pts−2.5 pts−1.1 pts−1.8 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

About as many homes sit empty in Eastwood Hills as nationally: 8.6%, against 9.6%. Vacancy is down 5.9 points from 2006–10, a much bigger shift than nationally.

Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).

Age of homes in Eastwood Hills

Age of homes, median year built
PeriodEastwood HillsKansas City areaMissouriU.S.
2006–101961197619741974
2010–141963197719751975
2015–191964197719761977
2020–241962198019781980
Change+1+4+4+6
Show on the map ↑︎

Eastwood Hills is a place of older homes: half were built before 1962, while the national median is 1980. That means established neighborhoods, and more houses that may need updating. The newest homes are mostly in the south, the oldest in the west.

Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).

Rent in Eastwood Hills

Rent, per month
PeriodEastwood HillsKansas City areaMissouriU.S.
2006–10$712$897$740$965
2010–14$799$980$816$1,040
2015–19$934$1,095$899$1,213
2020–24$1,205$1,395$1,122$1,571
Change+$494+$498+$383+$606
Show on the map ↑︎

A typical rental in Eastwood Hills costs $1,205 a month with utilities, well below the national median of $1,571. Rents are up $494 a month from 2006–10, a 69% jump, faster than rents rose nationally. The typical renter here spends 35.9% of household income on rent, well over the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, so many renters here are stretched. Renters on a budget will find the lowest rents in the southwest; the highest are in the center.

Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).

Education in Eastwood Hills

Bachelor's degrees in Eastwood Hills

Bachelor's degrees, % of adults 25+
PeriodEastwood HillsKansas City areaMissouriU.S.
2006–1012.0%33.5%26.0%28.4%
2010–1414.3%34.1%27.3%29.6%
2015–1916.4%37.1%29.6%32.1%
2020–2416.7%39.7%32.6%35.6%
Change+4.7 pts+6.2 pts+6.6 pts+7.2 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Fewer adults in Eastwood Hills have a four-year degree than in the country as a whole: 16.7%, against 35.6% nationally. Since 2006–10, the share with a degree has risen 4.7 points, as it has nationally. College graduates are most concentrated in the west and least in the northeast.

Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).

High school graduates in Eastwood Hills

High school graduates, % of adults 25+
PeriodEastwood HillsKansas City areaMissouriU.S.
2006–1085.7%90.5%86.8%84.9%
2010–1479.4%90.9%88.3%86.1%
2015–1987.9%91.8%90.0%87.7%
2020–2494.1%92.9%91.8%89.3%
Change+8.4 pts+2.4 pts+5.1 pts+4.3 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

High school completion in Eastwood Hills is above the national rate: 94.1% of adults have a diploma or equivalent, against 89.3%. The picture is much the same across the Kansas City area. The share with a diploma has risen 8.4 points since 2006–10, in line with the national trend.

High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).

Jobs in Eastwood Hills

Unemployment, % of the labor force
PeriodEastwood HillsKansas City areaMissouriU.S.
2006–108.9%6.8%7.4%8.1%
2010–1411.5%7.6%8.4%9.4%
2015–197.7%4.0%4.6%5.6%
2020–2410.5%4.0%4.1%5.4%
Change+1.6 pts−2.9 pts−3.3 pts−2.7 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Unemployment in Eastwood Hills runs well above the national rate: 10.5% of the labor force was out of work and looking, against 5.4%. Unemployment is up 1.6 points from 2006–10, even as the national rate fell. Because the Census pools five years of responses (2020–24), these rates smooth over short swings and lag the current job market.

Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).

Eastwood Hills compared with nearby neighborhoods

NeighborhoodHousehold sizeMedian ageSingle parentsRentersVacant homesMedian year builtMedian rentBachelor's degreeHigh school diplomaUnemployment
Eastwood Hills2.6633.018.4%50.2%8.6%1962$1,20516.7%94.1%10.5%
North Town Fork Creek2.1741.717.9%48.4%15.0%1949$83313.2%80.5%8.2%
Park Farms2.8034.69.9%45.7%9.4%1968$1,09513.0%96.8%1.4%
Oak Park Northwest2.2344.812.6%49.2%18.9%1939$94312.4%86.7%12.9%
Blue Hills2.2434.820.9%46.9%21.8%1944$1,30222.3%92.7%7.8%
East Community Team South2.2639.814.0%52.5%11.8%1942$1,0527.5%66.3%6.5%
Blenheim Square2.4535.122.1%54.6%17.9%1948$1,03020.6%87.0%6.3%
Eastern 49-632.3429.39.3%50.2%7.0%1938$1,39551.8%90.1%10.6%
East Community Team North2.7838.418.4%50.3%14.3%1944$8036.6%58.9%10.7%
Western 49-632.1035.65.0%18.3%4.4%1938$1,64470.7%99.3%4.8%
East Meyer2.6139.613.4%39.8%13.8%1948$1,30519.5%84.6%11.0%

All figures 2020–24.

Neighborhoods with similar populations: The Crossing, Las Vegas, NV · Bystrom, Modesto, CA · Valencia, Buckeye, AZ · Cass Gilbert, Waterbury, CT · Center Bluff, Peoria, IL · Charter Point, Jacksonville, FL · Coeur D'Alene Place, Coeur d'Alene, ID · Meredith, Des Moines, IA · Concord, Staten Island, NY · Arlington Heights, Arlington, MA

About these numbers

Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Eastwood Hills. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.

No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.