Population 425 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of Loving: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Loving
Household size in Loving
| Period | Loving | Texas | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.39 | 2.87 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.50 | 2.93 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.02 | 2.95 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.87 | 2.83 | 2.65 |
| Change | +0.48 | −0.05 | −0.03 |
Households in Loving average 2.87 people, above the national 2.65, so families with children are more common here. That is in line with the rest of Texas. Since 2006–10, household size has climbed from 2.39, but in a place this small, survey estimates can swing a lot from one release to the next.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Loving
| Period | Loving | Texas | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 52.3 | 34.7 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 52.1 | 35.4 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 57.4 | 36.1 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 45.7 | 36.7 | 40.1 |
| Change | −6.6 | +2.0 | +2.3 |
Loving skews older: half of its residents are older than 45.7, well above the national median of 40.1. That usually means more empty nesters and retirees, and fewer young families.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Loving
| Period | Loving | Texas | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 3.1% | 13.7% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 4.3% | 13.7% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 5.7% | 13.1% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 3.2% | 12.9% | 11.6% |
| Change | +0.1 pts | −0.8 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single parents head only 3.2% of households in Loving, well below the national share of 11.6%.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Loving
Renters in Loving
| Period | Loving | Texas | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 21.8% | 35.2% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 9.6% | 37.3% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 14.5% | 38.0% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 13.9% | 37.4% | 34.8% |
| Change | −7.9 pts | +2.3 pts | +1.5 pts |
Loving is overwhelmingly a place of homeowners: only 13.9% of households rent, far below the national share of 34.8%. Owner-heavy areas like this tend to see less turnover. About six in ten owners (58.6%) have paid off their mortgages, well above the national share of 39.8%.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Loving
| Period | Loving | Texas | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 16.3% | 11.8% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 21.0% | 10.9% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 19.8% | 10.9% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 23.7% | 9.4% | 9.6% |
| Change | +7.4 pts | −2.4 pts | −1.8 pts |
Vacant homes make up 23.7% of the housing in Loving, far above the national rate of 9.6%. In resort and lake areas that usually means seasonal and vacation homes; elsewhere it can point to weak demand.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Loving
| Period | Loving | Texas | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1981 | 1983 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1977 | 1985 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1977 | 1987 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1991 | 1992 | 1980 |
| Change | +11 | +8 | +6 |
Much of the housing in Loving is relatively new: half of its homes were built after 1991, compared with 1980 for the U.S. as a whole. Texas as a whole looks much the same.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Loving
| Period | Loving | Texas | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $559 | $921 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $550 | $1,005 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $684 | $1,178 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $478 | $1,560 | $1,571 |
| Change | −$81 | +$639 | +$606 |
The median renter in Loving pays $478 a month for rent and utilities, well below the national median of $1,571. The typical renter here spends 26.9% of household income on rent, comfortably under the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, and a smaller share than renters pay nationally.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Loving
Bachelor's degrees in Loving
| Period | Loving | Texas | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 15.3% | 27.0% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 30.7% | 27.9% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 29.6% | 30.0% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 32.9% | 34.0% | 35.6% |
| Change | +17.5 pts | +7.1 pts | +7.2 pts |
About a third of adults 25 and older in Loving (32.9%) hold at least a bachelor's degree, close to the national share of 35.6%.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Loving
| Period | Loving | Texas | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 80.8% | 80.7% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 93.2% | 82.0% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 95.7% | 83.6% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 98.9% | 85.8% | 89.3% |
| Change | +18.1 pts | +5.1 pts | +4.3 pts |
Finishing high school is nearly universal in Loving: 98.9% of adults 25 and older have a diploma or equivalent, well above the national rate of 89.3%.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Loving
| Period | Loving | Texas | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 4.6% | 7.0% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 1.9% | 7.7% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 0.3% | 5.1% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 0.2% | 5.3% | 5.4% |
| Change | −4.4 pts | −1.7 pts | −2.7 pts |
Unemployment in Loving has been low: just 0.2% of the labor force was out of work and looking, well below the national rate of 5.4%. Because the Census pools five years of responses (2020–24), these rates smooth over short swings and lag the current job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Loving compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loving | 2.87 | 45.7 | 3.2% | 13.9% | 23.7% | 1991 | $478 | 32.9% | 98.9% | 0.2% |
| Jermyn | 2.54 | 42.9 | 14.6% | 27.7% | 20.9% | 1985 | $1,021 | 16.9% | 87.9% | 8.6% |
| Markley | 2.92 | 44.7 | 8.0% | 17.7% | 37.7% | 1981 | $674 | 18.0% | 87.2% | 2.9% |
| Bryson | 2.38 | 44.6 | 10.6% | 23.6% | 14.1% | 1989 | $1,001 | 20.5% | 91.1% | 8.1% |
| Newcastle | 2.13 | 47.3 | 6.7% | 16.5% | 17.5% | 1981 | $591 | 19.7% | 86.8% | 4.7% |
| Olney | 2.37 | 41.4 | 11.1% | 34.6% | 15.0% | 1972 | $472 | 15.8% | 90.7% | 1.8% |
| Jacksboro | 2.63 | 41.6 | 9.9% | 28.7% | 21.1% | 1971 | $850 | 14.9% | 77.0% | 12.0% |
| Proffit | 2.25 | 42.9 | 6.5% | 21.3% | 19.8% | 1979 | $607 | 16.6% | 85.3% | 5.9% |
| Padgett | 2.56 | 44.3 | 4.9% | 19.7% | 22.7% | 1983 | $562 | 26.1% | 93.4% | 2.5% |
| Cundiff | 3.02 | 42.8 | 5.8% | 15.7% | 33.2% | 1985 | $946 | 15.0% | 81.9% | 9.0% |
| Elbert | 2.34 | 44.7 | 6.2% | 24.9% | 23.9% | 1966 | $821 | 28.1% | 97.0% | 1.0% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Three Springs, KY · Elwood, MS · Eola, TX · Epworth, KY · Epworth, SC · Eris, OH · Exchange, WV · Filburns Island, OH · Filley, NE · Footville, OH
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Loving. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.