Mounds, OK Demographics

Population 5,132 · Census ACS 2020–24

Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.

Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Mounds, OK map of median age by neighborhood
Click the map to explore
Younger residents Older residents
Colorblind friendly off

More maps of Mounds: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet

Jump to median age ↓︎

Population and households in Mounds

Household size in Mounds

Household size, people per household
PeriodMoundsTulsa areaOklahomaU.S.
2006–102.612.562.552.68
2010–142.772.602.602.73
2015–192.812.602.632.71
2020–242.842.592.582.65
Change+0.23+0.03+0.03−0.03
Show on the map ↑︎

The typical household in Mounds holds 2.84 people, more than the U.S. average of 2.65. Household size has climbed from 2.61 in 2006–10, even as the national average fell. Mounds has larger households than the great majority of Oklahoma cities.

Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).

Median age in Mounds

Median age, years
PeriodMoundsTulsa areaOklahomaU.S.
2006–1038.937.237.437.7
2010–1439.437.537.538.6
2015–1939.537.837.939.6
2020–2436.538.038.040.1
Change−2.4+0.8+0.6+2.3
Show on the map ↑︎

Mounds is younger than the country as a whole: its median age is 36.5, against 40.1 nationally. The median age has dropped from 38.9 in 2006–10, even as the national median rose. Residents skew youngest in the north and oldest in the south.

Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).

Single-parent households in Mounds

Single-parent households, % of households
PeriodMoundsTulsa areaOklahomaU.S.
2006–108.0%11.7%11.9%12.3%
2010–1411.0%12.5%12.1%12.3%
2015–198.6%12.2%12.1%11.6%
2020–2411.4%11.6%12.0%11.6%
Change+3.4 pts−0.1 pts+0.1 pts−0.6 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Single-parent households are about as common in Mounds as they are nationally: 11.4%, against 11.6%. The single-parent share is up 3.4 points from 2006–10, even as the national share fell.

Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).

Housing in Mounds

Renters in Mounds

Renters, % of occupied homes
PeriodMoundsTulsa areaOklahomaU.S.
2006–1014.5%32.5%31.8%33.3%
2010–1420.7%33.8%33.5%35.6%
2015–1919.3%35.2%34.4%36.0%
2020–2420.4%34.5%34.2%34.8%
Change+5.9 pts+2.1 pts+2.4 pts+1.5 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Only 20.4% of households in Mounds rent their homes, far below the national share of 34.8%, so most residents are owners who tend to stay put. Among homeowners, 49.2% have no mortgage at all, above the national share of 39.8%. Rentals cluster in the north; owners are most common in the south. Since 2006–10, the renter share has risen 5.9 points, a much bigger shift than nationally.

Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).

Vacant homes in Mounds

Vacant homes, % of all homes
PeriodMoundsTulsa areaOklahomaU.S.
2006–108.0%10.1%12.8%11.4%
2010–1414.2%10.3%12.7%11.4%
2015–1913.7%10.6%13.5%11.1%
2020–2410.7%8.5%11.3%9.6%
Change+2.7 pts−1.7 pts−1.5 pts−1.8 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

About as many homes sit empty in Mounds as nationally: 10.7%, against 9.6%. The rate is higher than in the wider Tulsa area (8.5%). Vacancy is up 2.7 points from 2006–10, even as the national rate fell.

Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).

Age of homes in Mounds

Age of homes, median year built
PeriodMoundsTulsa areaOklahomaU.S.
2006–101983197819761974
2010–141987197919771975
2015–191992198019791977
2020–241996198319821980
Change+13+6+7+6
Show on the map ↑︎

Mounds has newer housing than the country as a whole: the median home was built in 1996, versus 1980 nationally. The median year built has moved up from 1983 in 2006–10, a sign of steady new building. The newest homes are mostly in the south, the oldest in the east.

Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).

Rent in Mounds

Rent, per month
PeriodMoundsTulsa areaOklahomaU.S.
2006–10$675$794$716$965
2010–14$665$872$805$1,040
2015–19$857$979$897$1,213
2020–24$886$1,219$1,127$1,571
Change+$211+$425+$411+$606
Show on the map ↑︎

A typical rental in Mounds costs $886 a month with utilities, well below the national median of $1,571. Rent has climbed $211 a month since 2006–10, up 31%, a slower climb than the nation's. The typical renter here spends 25.1% of household income on rent, comfortably under the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, and a smaller share than renters pay nationally. The priciest rents are in the east; the most affordable are in the north.

Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).

Education in Mounds

Bachelor's degrees in Mounds

Bachelor's degrees, % of adults 25+
PeriodMoundsTulsa areaOklahomaU.S.
2006–1012.0%25.5%24.2%28.4%
2010–1414.6%26.2%24.9%29.6%
2015–1919.7%27.7%26.1%32.1%
2020–2417.2%30.3%28.9%35.6%
Change+5.2 pts+4.8 pts+4.7 pts+7.2 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

College degrees are relatively uncommon in Mounds: 17.2% of adults 25 and older hold a bachelor's or higher, well below the national share of 35.6%. The share with a degree is up 5.2 points from 2006–10, as it has nationally.

Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).

High school graduates in Mounds

High school graduates, % of adults 25+
PeriodMoundsTulsa areaOklahomaU.S.
2006–1085.5%87.7%86.0%84.9%
2010–1487.2%88.4%87.0%86.1%
2015–1986.7%89.3%88.1%87.7%
2020–2492.5%90.1%89.3%89.3%
Change+7.0 pts+2.4 pts+3.3 pts+4.3 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

About nine in ten adults in Mounds have finished high school (92.5%), a bit above the national rate of 89.3%. Since 2006–10, the share with a diploma has risen 7.0 points, mirroring the country.

High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).

Jobs in Mounds

Unemployment, % of the labor force
PeriodMoundsTulsa areaOklahomaU.S.
2006–107.0%6.2%6.1%8.1%
2010–145.1%7.1%6.8%9.4%
2015–194.7%5.5%5.2%5.6%
2020–246.0%5.2%5.0%5.4%
Change−1.0 pts−0.9 pts−1.1 pts−2.7 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

At 6.0%, unemployment in Mounds is close to the national rate of 5.4%. The rate is higher than in the Tulsa area as a whole (5.2%). Because the Census pools five years of responses (2020–24), these rates smooth over short swings and lag the current job market.

Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).

Mounds compared with nearby cities

CityHousehold sizeMedian ageSingle parentsRentersVacant homesMedian year builtMedian rentBachelor's degreeHigh school diplomaUnemployment
Mounds2.8436.511.4%20.4%10.7%1996$88617.2%92.5%6.0%
Liberty2.8642.07.6%10.2%5.6%1997$98826.5%91.9%7.5%
Winchester2.7439.411.8%10.0%7.0%1993$1,03618.1%90.6%4.8%
Kiefer2.7937.210.2%18.4%10.0%2000$1,19922.2%94.0%4.3%
Beggs2.6738.611.5%19.5%14.8%1986$92617.9%88.9%4.5%
Glenpool2.8335.211.8%29.1%2.2%1998$1,27428.7%92.3%3.5%
Natura2.9340.813.2%6.7%7.0%1991$1,03521.2%92.4%5.2%
Slick2.9843.63.6%10.2%10.2%1994$94217.5%91.8%4.4%
Edna3.0538.57.4%13.1%8.5%1993$97419.9%94.0%6.1%
Kellyville2.6641.77.4%21.6%10.9%1990$92113.9%89.2%3.7%
Bixby2.7837.09.7%25.6%5.5%1998$1,53145.5%94.1%4.1%

All figures 2020–24.

Cities with similar populations: Vinton, IA · Waialua, HI · Wahoo, NE · Wadena, MN · Duncanville, AL · Dundee, FL · Waban, MA · Dundee, OH · Voorheesville, NY · Vonore, TN

About these numbers

Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Mounds. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.

No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.