Population 776 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of Natura: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Natura
Household size in Natura
| Period | Natura | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.75 | 2.56 | 2.55 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.75 | 2.60 | 2.60 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 3.00 | 2.60 | 2.63 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.93 | 2.59 | 2.58 | 2.65 |
| Change | +0.19 | +0.03 | +0.03 | −0.03 |
Natura is a place of big households: 2.93 people per home on average, compared with 2.65 nationally. Numbers like that usually point to plenty of families with kids. Since 2006–10, household size has climbed from 2.75, but in a place this small, much of that may be survey noise rather than real change.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Natura
| Period | Natura | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 39.4 | 37.2 | 37.4 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 41.8 | 37.5 | 37.5 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 37.6 | 37.8 | 37.9 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 40.8 | 38.0 | 38.0 | 40.1 |
| Change | +1.3 | +0.8 | +0.6 | +2.3 |
Half of the people in Natura are younger than 40.8 and half are older, close to the national median of 40.1. The population here is older than in the wider Tulsa area, where the median age is 38.0.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Natura
| Period | Natura | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 7.6% | 11.7% | 11.9% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 9.7% | 12.5% | 12.1% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 11.8% | 12.2% | 12.1% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 13.2% | 11.6% | 12.0% | 11.6% |
| Change | +5.7 pts | −0.1 pts | +0.1 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single parents head just over one in eight households in Natura (13.2%), a bit above the national share of 11.6%.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Natura
Renters in Natura
| Period | Natura | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 8.4% | 32.5% | 31.8% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 17.1% | 33.8% | 33.5% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 12.5% | 35.2% | 34.4% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 6.7% | 34.5% | 34.2% | 34.8% |
| Change | −1.6 pts | +2.1 pts | +2.4 pts | +1.5 pts |
Natura is overwhelmingly a place of homeowners: only 6.7% of households rent, far below the national share of 34.8%. Owner-heavy areas like this tend to see less turnover. More than half of owners (54.5%) have paid off their mortgages, well above the national share of 39.8%.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Natura
| Period | Natura | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 11.4% | 10.1% | 12.8% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 9.2% | 10.3% | 12.7% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 13.1% | 10.6% | 13.5% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 7.0% | 8.5% | 11.3% | 9.6% |
| Change | −4.4 pts | −1.7 pts | −1.5 pts | −1.8 pts |
Fewer homes sit empty in Natura than nationally: 7.0%, against 9.6% for the U.S. The picture is much the same across the Tulsa area.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Natura
| Period | Natura | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1985 | 1978 | 1976 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1986 | 1979 | 1977 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1991 | 1980 | 1979 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1991 | 1983 | 1982 | 1980 |
| Change | +7 | +6 | +7 | +6 |
Natura has newer housing than the country as a whole: the median home was built in 1991, versus 1980 nationally.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Natura
| Period | Natura | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $624 | $794 | $716 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $748 | $872 | $805 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $861 | $979 | $897 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $1,035 | $1,219 | $1,127 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$411 | +$425 | +$411 | +$606 |
A typical rental in Natura costs $1,035 a month with utilities, well below the national median of $1,571. The typical renter here spends 18.1% of household income on rent, comfortably under the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, and a smaller share than renters pay nationally.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Natura
Bachelor's degrees in Natura
| Period | Natura | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 12.4% | 25.5% | 24.2% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 12.3% | 26.2% | 24.9% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 17.1% | 27.7% | 26.1% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 21.2% | 30.3% | 28.9% | 35.6% |
| Change | +8.8 pts | +4.8 pts | +4.7 pts | +7.2 pts |
College degrees are relatively uncommon in Natura: 21.2% of adults 25 and older hold a bachelor's or higher, well below the national share of 35.6%.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Natura
| Period | Natura | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 85.8% | 87.7% | 86.0% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 85.2% | 88.4% | 87.0% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 89.5% | 89.3% | 88.1% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 92.4% | 90.1% | 89.3% | 89.3% |
| Change | +6.5 pts | +2.4 pts | +3.3 pts | +4.3 pts |
High school completion in Natura is a bit above the national rate: 92.4% of adults have a diploma or equivalent, against 89.3%.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Natura
| Period | Natura | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 6.2% | 6.2% | 6.1% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 8.7% | 7.1% | 6.8% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 6.8% | 5.5% | 5.2% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 5.2% | 5.2% | 5.0% | 5.4% |
| Change | −1.0 pts | −0.9 pts | −1.1 pts | −2.7 pts |
At 5.2%, unemployment in Natura is close to the national rate of 5.4%. Each figure pools five years of surveys (2020–24), so it describes that whole stretch rather than today's job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Natura compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natura | 2.93 | 40.8 | 13.2% | 6.7% | 7.0% | 1991 | $1,035 | 21.2% | 92.4% | 5.2% |
| Winchester | 2.74 | 39.4 | 11.8% | 10.0% | 7.0% | 1993 | $1,036 | 18.1% | 90.6% | 4.8% |
| Preston | 2.62 | 44.4 | 7.9% | 11.2% | 12.1% | 1979 | $933 | 38.0% | 97.0% | 7.2% |
| Beggs | 2.67 | 38.6 | 11.5% | 19.5% | 14.8% | 1986 | $926 | 17.9% | 88.9% | 4.5% |
| Liberty | 2.86 | 42.0 | 7.6% | 10.2% | 5.6% | 1997 | $988 | 26.5% | 91.9% | 7.5% |
| Mounds | 2.84 | 36.5 | 11.4% | 20.4% | 10.7% | 1996 | $886 | 17.2% | 92.5% | 6.0% |
| Okmulgee | 2.43 | 37.4 | 15.5% | 41.9% | 17.1% | 1965 | $834 | 15.6% | 87.8% | 8.2% |
| Pumpkin Center | 2.89 | 40.3 | 12.0% | 17.5% | 10.4% | 1998 | $907 | 20.5% | 85.6% | 4.6% |
| Morris | 2.64 | 39.5 | 12.1% | 26.7% | 12.1% | 1983 | $854 | 23.9% | 93.9% | 4.6% |
| Nuyaka | 2.59 | 35.9 | 4.9% | 13.9% | 12.6% | 1989 | $810 | 19.2% | 96.5% | 2.1% |
| Edna | 3.05 | 38.5 | 7.4% | 13.1% | 8.5% | 1993 | $974 | 19.9% | 94.0% | 6.1% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Clifton, KY · Turner, MI · Umikoa, HI · Dutton, MI · Dadeville, MO · Cut, TX · Cricket, NC · Crab Orchard Estates, IL · Cornwallville, NY · Conway, MS
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Natura. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.