Newcastle, CA Demographics

Population 7,062 · Census ACS 2020–24

Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.

Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Newcastle, CA map of median age by neighborhood
Click the map to explore
Younger residents Older residents
Colorblind friendly off

More maps of Newcastle: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet

Jump to median age ↓︎

Population and households in Newcastle

Household size in Newcastle

Household size, people per household
PeriodNewcastleSacramento areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–102.582.763.042.68
2010–142.572.813.102.73
2015–192.612.823.092.71
2020–242.612.833.012.65
Change+0.03+0.07−0.03−0.03
Show on the map ↑︎

At 2.61 people per household, Newcastle sits close to the national average of 2.65. The typical household here is smaller than in the Sacramento area as a whole, where it has 2.83 people.

Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).

Median age in Newcastle

Median age, years
PeriodNewcastleSacramento areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–1047.836.735.837.7
2010–1449.737.636.838.6
2015–1950.138.737.939.6
2020–2453.639.639.040.1
Change+5.8+2.9+3.1+2.3
Show on the map ↑︎

With a median age of 53.6, Newcastle is noticeably older than the country as a whole (40.1), an age mix that tilts toward empty nesters and retirees. Since 2006–10, the median age has climbed from 47.8, mirroring the country. Only 14 of the 689 California cities with 5,000+ people are older.

Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).

Single-parent households in Newcastle

Single-parent households, % of households
PeriodNewcastleSacramento areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–104.5%12.8%13.5%12.3%
2010–144.8%12.9%13.5%12.3%
2015–196.0%11.5%12.3%11.6%
2020–243.0%11.0%12.3%11.6%
Change−1.5 pts−1.7 pts−1.2 pts−0.6 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Single parents head only 3.0% of households in Newcastle, well below the national share of 11.6%. The single-parent share has fallen 1.5 points since 2006–10, in line with the national trend. Of the 689 California cities with 5,000+ people, only 12 have a lower share of single-parent households.

Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).

Housing in Newcastle

Renters in Newcastle

Renters, % of occupied homes
PeriodNewcastleSacramento areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–109.5%37.3%42.6%33.3%
2010–1411.9%40.4%45.2%35.6%
2015–1914.0%39.7%45.2%36.0%
2020–248.4%37.0%44.1%34.8%
Change−1.1 pts−0.3 pts+1.5 pts+1.5 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Only 8.4% of households in Newcastle rent their homes, far below the national share of 34.8%, so most residents are owners who tend to stay put. Among homeowners, 40.5% have no mortgage at all, about the same as nationally. The renter share is down 1.1 points from 2006–10, even as the national share rose. Of the 689 California cities with 5,000+ people, only 12 have a lower share of renters.

Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).

Vacant homes in Newcastle

Vacant homes, % of all homes
PeriodNewcastleSacramento areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–104.3%9.3%8.7%11.4%
2010–146.2%8.7%8.1%11.4%
2015–195.9%6.7%7.5%11.1%
2020–247.3%6.7%7.3%9.6%
Change+3.1 pts−2.6 pts−1.4 pts−1.8 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Vacancy is on the low side in Newcastle: 7.3% of homes sit empty, against 9.6% nationally, which points to steady demand for housing. The picture is much the same across the Sacramento area. Vacancy has risen 3.1 points since 2006–10, even as the national rate fell.

Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).

Age of homes in Newcastle

Age of homes, median year built
PeriodNewcastleSacramento areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–101980198019721974
2010–141980198119731975
2015–191981198219741977
2020–241983198519761980
Change+3+5+4+6
Show on the map ↑︎

Homes in Newcastle are about the same age as the nation's housing: the median home was built in 1983, versus 1980 nationally. The median year built has moved up from 1980 in 2006–10, a sign of steady new building.

Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).

Rent in Newcastle

Rent, per month
PeriodNewcastleSacramento areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–10$864$1,199$1,298$965
2010–14$1,258$1,254$1,379$1,040
2015–19$1,326$1,488$1,721$1,213
2020–24$1,888$2,018$2,229$1,571
Change+$1,024+$818+$931+$606
Show on the map ↑︎

Rent in Newcastle runs $1,888 a month at the median, utilities included, well above the U.S. median of $1,571. Still, rents here are lower than in the wider Sacramento area ($2,018). Rents are up $1,024 a month from 2006–10, a 118% jump, faster than rents rose nationally. The typical renter here spends 20.5% of household income on rent, comfortably under the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, and a smaller share than renters pay nationally.

Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).

Education in Newcastle

Bachelor's degrees in Newcastle

Bachelor's degrees, % of adults 25+
PeriodNewcastleSacramento areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–1034.6%30.1%29.1%28.4%
2010–1438.6%30.6%30.1%29.6%
2015–1940.9%33.6%32.9%32.1%
2020–2442.7%37.4%36.3%35.6%
Change+8.2 pts+7.2 pts+7.1 pts+7.2 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

College degrees are more common in Newcastle than nationally: 42.7% of adults 25 and older have a bachelor's or higher, against 35.6%. Since 2006–10, the share with a degree has risen 8.2 points, as it has nationally.

Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).

High school graduates in Newcastle

High school graduates, % of adults 25+
PeriodNewcastleSacramento areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–1094.7%86.8%79.9%84.9%
2010–1495.5%87.6%80.7%86.1%
2015–1997.1%89.0%82.6%87.7%
2020–2494.1%89.9%84.2%89.3%
Change−0.6 pts+3.1 pts+4.3 pts+4.3 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

High school completion in Newcastle is above the national rate: 94.1% of adults have a diploma, against 89.3%. Since 2006–10, the share with a diploma has edged down 0.6 points, even as the national rate rose.

High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).

Jobs in Newcastle

Unemployment, % of the labor force
PeriodNewcastleSacramento areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–107.7%9.7%9.2%8.1%
2010–1411.4%12.4%11.3%9.4%
2015–193.6%6.1%6.3%5.6%
2020–245.7%6.2%6.6%5.4%
Change−2.0 pts−3.5 pts−2.6 pts−2.7 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Unemployment in Newcastle is close to the national rate: 5.7% of the labor force, against 5.4%. Unemployment has fallen 2.0 points since 2006–10, in line with the national trend. Because the Census pools five years of responses (2020–24), these rates smooth over short swings and lag the current job market.

Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).

Newcastle compared with nearby cities

CityHousehold sizeMedian ageSingle parentsRentersVacant homesMedian year builtMedian rentBachelor's degreeHigh school diplomaUnemployment
Newcastle2.6153.63.0%8.4%7.3%1983$1,88842.7%94.1%5.7%
Penryn2.7550.33.3%9.2%7.8%1984$2,12842.7%95.6%5.6%
Loomis2.7644.64.2%11.8%4.7%1989$2,07547.5%97.2%4.1%
North Auburn2.4446.813.7%35.2%6.6%1984$1,77725.4%90.2%4.2%
Auburn2.4251.67.4%23.1%7.6%1978$1,88736.4%95.1%4.9%
Pilot Hill2.0761.21.5%7.4%4.3%1991$2,09931.3%98.5%15.3%
Rocklin2.8839.57.4%31.1%5.6%1997$2,44047.1%95.6%4.4%
Lincoln2.8344.011.0%15.9%4.6%2001$2,49637.7%94.0%4.2%
Cool2.4652.44.2%5.5%8.5%1985$2,10737.1%99.1%2.2%
Clipper Gap2.5643.98.1%16.9%12.1%1970$1,55820.2%94.9%3.0%
Granite Bay2.8748.36.0%11.4%7.4%1987$2,85863.6%97.1%4.4%

All figures 2020–24.

Cities with similar populations: Columbia Station, OH · Tazewell, TN · Taylor Mill, KY · Tallulah, LA · Sunset, LA · Sulphur, OK · Sullivan, IN · Strafford, MO · Stoneville, NC · Stewartville, MN

About these numbers

Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Newcastle. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.

No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.