Population 173 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of Sterling Valley: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Sterling Valley
Household size in Sterling Valley
| Period | Sterling Valley | Syracuse area | New York | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.37 | 2.51 | 2.68 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.27 | 2.50 | 2.72 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.22 | 2.46 | 2.69 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.48 | 2.34 | 2.65 | 2.65 |
| Change | +0.10 | −0.17 | −0.03 | −0.03 |
Households in Sterling Valley run small, averaging 2.48 people against 2.65 nationally, which usually means more singles and couples and fewer children. Still, the typical household here is bigger than in the wider Syracuse area, where it has 2.34 people. Since 2006–10, household size has climbed from 2.37, but in a place this small, much of that may be survey noise rather than real change.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Sterling Valley
| Period | Sterling Valley | Syracuse area | New York | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 43.4 | 38.9 | 38.3 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 46.6 | 39.7 | 39.0 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 47.0 | 40.7 | 40.2 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 48.7 | 41.4 | 40.8 | 40.1 |
| Change | +5.3 | +2.5 | +2.5 | +2.3 |
Sterling Valley skews older: half of its residents are older than 48.7, well above the national median of 40.1. That usually means more empty nesters and retirees, and fewer young families.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Sterling Valley
| Period | Sterling Valley | Syracuse area | New York | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 5.7% | 12.1% | 13.1% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 3.2% | 12.1% | 12.7% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 8.2% | 12.0% | 11.6% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 2.5% | 11.4% | 11.6% | 11.6% |
| Change | −3.2 pts | −0.7 pts | −1.5 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single parents head only 2.5% of households in Sterling Valley, well below the national share of 11.6%.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Sterling Valley
Renters in Sterling Valley
| Period | Sterling Valley | Syracuse area | New York | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 27.2% | 31.6% | 44.8% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 24.3% | 32.9% | 46.2% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 16.2% | 32.9% | 46.2% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 12.8% | 31.6% | 45.7% | 34.8% |
| Change | −14.4 pts | −0.0 pts | +0.9 pts | +1.5 pts |
Sterling Valley is overwhelmingly a place of homeowners: only 12.8% of households rent, far below the national share of 34.8%. Owner-heavy areas like this tend to see less turnover. Just over half of owners (53.4%) have paid off their mortgages, well above the national share of 39.8%.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Sterling Valley
| Period | Sterling Valley | Syracuse area | New York | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 32.4% | 11.2% | 10.3% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 37.8% | 11.4% | 10.4% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 39.5% | 13.0% | 11.0% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 40.5% | 9.4% | 9.7% | 9.6% |
| Change | +8.1 pts | −1.8 pts | −0.6 pts | −1.8 pts |
Vacancy is high in Sterling Valley: 40.5% of homes are empty, far above the national rate of 9.6%. In resort and lake areas that usually means seasonal and vacation homes; elsewhere it can point to weak demand.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Sterling Valley
| Period | Sterling Valley | Syracuse area | New York | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1961 | 1962 | 1956 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1978 | 1963 | 1957 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1960 | 1964 | 1958 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1958 | 1967 | 1961 | 1980 |
| Change | −3 | +5 | +5 | +6 |
Sterling Valley is a place of older homes: half were built before 1958, while the national median is 1980. That means established neighborhoods, and more houses that may need updating.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Sterling Valley
| Period | Sterling Valley | Syracuse area | New York | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $622 | $748 | $1,095 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $650 | $794 | $1,201 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $869 | $911 | $1,426 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $583 | $1,138 | $1,794 | $1,571 |
| Change | −$39 | +$390 | +$698 | +$606 |
A typical rental in Sterling Valley costs $583 a month with utilities, well below the national median of $1,571. Rent takes 27.3% of the typical renter's income, just under the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Sterling Valley
Bachelor's degrees in Sterling Valley
| Period | Sterling Valley | Syracuse area | New York | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 22.7% | 28.7% | 31.9% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 29.1% | 30.7% | 33.4% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 30.6% | 31.8% | 36.2% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 37.6% | 35.8% | 39.8% | 35.6% |
| Change | +14.9 pts | +7.2 pts | +8.0 pts | +7.2 pts |
College degrees are about as common in Sterling Valley as nationally: 37.6% of adults 25 and older have a bachelor's or higher, against 35.6%.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Sterling Valley
| Period | Sterling Valley | Syracuse area | New York | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 89.3% | 88.6% | 84.0% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 91.3% | 89.1% | 84.9% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 96.5% | 90.3% | 86.5% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 91.3% | 91.3% | 87.3% | 89.3% |
| Change | +2.0 pts | +2.7 pts | +3.3 pts | +4.3 pts |
About nine in ten adults in Sterling Valley have finished high school (91.3%), a bit above the national rate of 89.3%. The picture is much the same across the Syracuse area.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Sterling Valley
| Period | Sterling Valley | Syracuse area | New York | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 9.5% | 7.3% | 7.7% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 12.9% | 8.5% | 9.2% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 5.9% | 5.8% | 5.7% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 4.8% | 5.6% | 6.6% | 5.4% |
| Change | −4.7 pts | −1.7 pts | −1.2 pts | −2.7 pts |
Unemployment in Sterling Valley is close to the national rate: 4.8% of the labor force, against 5.4%. The rate is lower than in the wider Syracuse area (5.6%). Each figure pools five years of surveys (2020–24), so it describes that whole stretch rather than today's job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Sterling Valley compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sterling Valley | 2.48 | 48.7 | 2.5% | 12.8% | 40.5% | 1958 | $583 | 37.6% | 91.3% | 4.8% |
| Southwest Oswego | 2.44 | 40.4 | 4.6% | 6.3% | 17.5% | 1977 | $911 | 41.3% | 89.4% | 10.5% |
| Sterling | 2.16 | 52.6 | 5.8% | 9.9% | 20.0% | 1961 | $952 | 25.9% | 89.9% | 3.1% |
| North Hannibal | 2.24 | 37.8 | 6.6% | 20.0% | 14.6% | 1983 | $1,351 | 7.3% | 88.0% | 1.0% |
| Furniss | 2.47 | 44.2 | 1.7% | 7.5% | 13.1% | 1977 | $1,125 | 27.7% | 93.9% | 11.8% |
| Fair Haven | 2.33 | 52.9 | 2.0% | 14.1% | 38.9% | 1956 | $711 | 33.0% | 91.4% | 3.2% |
| Hannibal | 2.59 | 43.1 | 7.2% | 18.9% | 6.7% | 1983 | $1,233 | 10.8% | 86.2% | 4.4% |
| Hannibal Center | 2.68 | 40.4 | 9.1% | 5.8% | 5.5% | 1982 | $1,093 | 16.3% | 90.1% | 9.1% |
| Minetto | 2.51 | 46.1 | 8.0% | 13.3% | 4.8% | 1967 | $853 | 35.8% | 94.2% | 8.6% |
| Martville | 2.61 | 42.7 | 8.6% | 6.0% | 7.9% | 1967 | $938 | 16.2% | 89.0% | 5.3% |
| North Victory | 2.57 | 44.8 | 9.5% | 3.2% | 8.7% | 1961 | $846 | 16.4% | 88.8% | 4.9% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Sequoyah, OK · Matlock, KY · Mayhew, MS · Rosewood, TX · Saronville, NE · Schug, AR · Sconondoa, NY · Scott Lake, MI · Scranton, TX · Seanor, PA
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Sterling Valley. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.