Population 132 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of Sugar Pine: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Sugar Pine
Household size in Sugar Pine
| Period | Sugar Pine | Fresno area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.08 | 3.29 | 3.04 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.30 | 3.31 | 3.10 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 1.93 | 3.27 | 3.09 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.47 | 3.25 | 3.01 | 2.65 |
| Change | +0.39 | −0.04 | −0.03 | −0.03 |
Households in Sugar Pine run small, averaging 2.47 people against 2.65 nationally, which usually means more singles and couples and fewer children. Household size has climbed from 2.08 in 2006–10, but in a place this small, much of that may be survey noise rather than real change.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Sugar Pine
| Period | Sugar Pine | Fresno area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 50.1 | 32.4 | 35.8 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 51.3 | 33.1 | 36.8 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 56.0 | 33.9 | 37.9 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 42.4 | 34.5 | 39.0 | 40.1 |
| Change | −7.7 | +2.2 | +3.1 | +2.3 |
The median resident of Sugar Pine is 42.4 years old, a bit older than the national median of 40.1.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Sugar Pine
| Period | Sugar Pine | Fresno area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 4.8% | 17.2% | 13.5% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 6.3% | 18.5% | 13.5% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 4.8% | 17.9% | 12.3% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 9.7% | 17.7% | 12.3% | 11.6% |
| Change | +4.9 pts | +0.5 pts | −1.2 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single parents head about one in ten households in Sugar Pine (9.7%), a little below the national share of 11.6%.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Sugar Pine
Renters in Sugar Pine
| Period | Sugar Pine | Fresno area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 23.0% | 44.0% | 42.6% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 21.5% | 45.9% | 45.2% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 20.3% | 45.3% | 45.2% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 7.9% | 43.0% | 44.1% | 34.8% |
| Change | −15.1 pts | −1.0 pts | +1.5 pts | +1.5 pts |
Sugar Pine is overwhelmingly a place of homeowners: only 7.9% of households rent, far below the national share of 34.8%. Owner-heavy areas like this tend to see less turnover. Nearly four in ten owners (37.6%) have paid off their mortgages, about the same as nationally.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Sugar Pine
| Period | Sugar Pine | Fresno area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 34.8% | 9.6% | 8.7% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 38.6% | 8.8% | 8.1% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 37.6% | 7.5% | 7.5% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 50.0% | 6.8% | 7.3% | 9.6% |
| Change | +15.2 pts | −2.8 pts | −1.4 pts | −1.8 pts |
Vacancy is high in Sugar Pine: 50.0% of homes are empty, far above the national rate of 9.6%. In resort and lake areas that usually means seasonal and vacation homes; elsewhere it can point to weak demand.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Sugar Pine
| Period | Sugar Pine | Fresno area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1978 | 1977 | 1972 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1978 | 1980 | 1973 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1976 | 1981 | 1974 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1973 | 1984 | 1976 | 1980 |
| Change | −5 | +6 | +4 | +6 |
Homes in Sugar Pine run older than the national norm, with a median build year of 1973 against 1980.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Sugar Pine
| Period | Sugar Pine | Fresno area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $893 | $968 | $1,298 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $1,060 | $1,042 | $1,379 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $1,193 | $1,170 | $1,721 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $1,624 | $1,635 | $2,229 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$731 | +$667 | +$931 | +$606 |
Rent in Sugar Pine runs $1,624 a month at the median, utilities included, close to the U.S. median of $1,571. The typical renter here spends 29.8% of household income on rent, just under the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, and a smaller share than renters pay nationally.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Sugar Pine
Bachelor's degrees in Sugar Pine
| Period | Sugar Pine | Fresno area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 24.9% | 18.7% | 29.1% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 22.1% | 18.6% | 30.1% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 21.6% | 19.6% | 32.9% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 37.0% | 23.1% | 36.3% | 35.6% |
| Change | +12.1 pts | +4.4 pts | +7.1 pts | +7.2 pts |
College degrees are about as common in Sugar Pine as nationally: 37.0% of adults 25 and older have a bachelor's or higher, against 35.6%. The share is higher than in the Fresno area overall (23.1%).
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Sugar Pine
| Period | Sugar Pine | Fresno area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 92.9% | 71.6% | 79.9% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 91.1% | 72.0% | 80.7% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 92.7% | 74.4% | 82.6% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 97.9% | 77.5% | 84.2% | 89.3% |
| Change | +5.0 pts | +5.9 pts | +4.3 pts | +4.3 pts |
Finishing high school is nearly universal in Sugar Pine: 97.9% of adults 25 and older have a diploma or equivalent, well above the national rate of 89.3%.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Sugar Pine
| Period | Sugar Pine | Fresno area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 6.7% | 11.7% | 9.2% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 13.7% | 14.0% | 11.3% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 6.0% | 9.0% | 6.3% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 16.6% | 9.0% | 6.6% | 5.4% |
| Change | +9.9 pts | −2.7 pts | −2.6 pts | −2.7 pts |
Unemployment in Sugar Pine runs well above the national rate: 16.6% of the labor force was out of work and looking, against 5.4%. Because the Census pools five years of responses (2020–24), these rates smooth over short swings and lag the current job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Sugar Pine compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sugar Pine | 2.47 | 42.4 | 9.7% | 7.9% | 50.0% | 1973 | $1,624 | 37.0% | 97.9% | 16.6% |
| Incline | 1.73 | 56.5 | 8.0% | 12.7% | 32.9% | 1979 | $1,812 | 35.0% | 87.2% | 21.0% |
| Foresta | 1.98 | 23.5 | 3.2% | 49.8% | 91.3% | 1940 | $1,458 | 8.9% | 99.6% | 45.5% |
| El Portal | 1.64 | 35.2 | 5.3% | 60.2% | 15.6% | 1981 | $1,174 | 41.9% | 91.6% | 4.3% |
| Groveland | 2.10 | 49.1 | 9.9% | 25.7% | 37.2% | 1980 | $1,285 | 14.0% | 94.2% | 6.5% |
| Greeley Hill | 2.09 | 43.1 | 9.5% | 10.5% | 37.4% | 1984 | $2,162 | 14.8% | 89.2% | 4.1% |
| Yosemite National Park | 1.61 | 38.5 | 5.3% | 58.1% | 20.9% | 1979 | $1,209 | 41.9% | 91.0% | 6.4% |
| Yosemite Junction | 1.17 | 66.9 | 4.6% | 67.2% | 72.2% | 1971 | $1,195 | 50.5% | 81.7% | 7.8% |
| Pine Mountain Lake | 2.03 | 57.8 | 6.4% | 11.7% | 54.1% | 1984 | $1,390 | 30.8% | 97.5% | 8.7% |
| Coulterville | 2.02 | 51.8 | 5.0% | 16.3% | 28.6% | 1988 | $2,032 | 18.5% | 88.5% | 3.7% |
| Big Oak Flat | 2.11 | 50.6 | 9.9% | 22.5% | 29.2% | 1984 | $1,336 | 15.0% | 92.9% | 3.9% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: South Corinth, NY · Keysburg, KY · Khedive, PA · Kings Crossroads, NC · Kirk, OR · Kirley, SD · Koenton, AL · Kyle, NC · La Forge, MO · La Palma, AZ
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Sugar Pine. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.